Cited by 128Malaria Research and ControlParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentMosquito-borne diseases and control

Short-range attractiveness of pregnant women to Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes

Ansell, J., Hamilton, K.A., Pinder, M., Walraven, G.E.L., Lindsay, S.W.·2002·Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Malaria is a major cause of illness and an indirect cause of mortality in pregnant women. It can also cause stillbirths and low-birthweight babies. We have shown previously that pregnant women attracted twice as many Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, the principal African malaria vector, as their non-pregnant counterparts over distances of about 15 m. In the current study (in 1998/99) we compared the short-range attractiveness of both pregnant and non-pregnant women sleeping under untreated bednets in Gambian villages. First, we measured the rate of mosquito entry under bednets and, second, we calculated the proportion of mosquitoes biting mothers under each bednet compared to their children. The feeding preference of An. gambiae collected under nets was determined by DNA fingerprinting blood samples from human subjects sleeping under each bednet and comparing these to fingerprints obtained from mosquito bloodmeals. Pregnant women were more attractive to An. gambiae mosquitoes than non-pregnant women under an untreated bednet. The number of mosquitoes entering bednets each night was 1.7-4.5 times higher in the pregnant group (P = 0.02) and pregnant women also received a higher proportion of bites under the bednets than did non-pregnant women (70% vs 52%, P = 0.001). This study clearly demonstrates that pregnant women are more exposed to malaria parasites than other women, which contributes to the greater vulnerability of pregnant women to malaria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90271-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiological changes include increased exhaled breath and increased abdominal temperature that may render pregnant women more easily detectable by mosquitoes.

    “Physiological changes include increased exhaled breath and increased abdominal temperature that may render pregnant women more easily detectable by mosquitoes.”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Pregnant women urinate twice as frequently as non-pregnant women, resulting in increased exposure to mosquito bites at night because they have to leave the protection of their bed nets.

    “Behavioural changes are represented by the fact that pregnant women urinate twice as frequently as non-pregnant women, resulting in an increased exposure to mosquito bites at night because they have to leave the protection of their bed nets.60–61”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [61]

  • The increased susceptibility of pregnant women to malaria can be explained by immunological changes induced by pregnancy, hormonal factors, and higher attractiveness of pregnant women to mosquitoes.

    “This increased susceptibility can be explained by the immunological changes induced by pregnancy, by hormonal factors,59 and by the higher attractiveness of pregnant women to mosquitoes.60–61”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [61]

  • The increased attractiveness of pregnant women to mosquitoes may be explained by physiological and behavioural changes occurring during pregnancy.

    “The increased attractiveness of pregnant women to mosquitoes may be explained by physiological and behavioural changes occurring during pregnancy.”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ansell, J., Hamilton, K. A., Pinder, M., Walraven, G. E. L., & Lindsay, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Medical Research Council (GB)
Venue
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2002-03
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
113-116
ISSN
0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017092438
Cited by
128
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Keywords
Anopheles gambiae, pregnant women, malaria, mosquito attraction, malaria in pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Anopheles, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Malaria, Mosquito Control, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review