Extraction procedures for the determination of heavy metals in contaminated soil and sediment
Abstract
Extraction tests are commonly used to study the mobility of metals in soils and sediments by mimicking different environmental conditions or dramatic changes on them. The results obtained by determining the extractable elements are dependent on the extraction procedure applied. The paper summarises state of the art extraction procedures used for heavy metal determination in contaminated soil and sediments. Two types of extraction are considered: single and sequential. Special attention is paid to the Standard, Measurement and Testing projects from the European Commission which focused on the harmonisation of the extraction procedures and on preparing soil and sediment certified reference materials for extractable heavy metal contents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A widely used technique for understanding element distribution in the solid phase (i.e., fractionation) is based on the application of sequential selective chemical extractions.
“A widely used technique for understanding element distribution in the solid phase (i.e., fractionation) is based on the application of sequential selective chemical extractions [70 -72].”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [70]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gong, Z. (2002) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/s0039-9140(02)00258-8 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments
Caporale, A. G., & Violante, A. (2016) · Current Pollution Reports · doi:10.1007/s40726-015-0024-y · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Sorption and desorption of Pb(II) to biochar as affected by oxidation and pH
Wang, Q., Wang, B., Lee, X., Lehmann, J., & Gao, B. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.189 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rauret, G.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Rauret, G
- Venue
- Talanta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-455
- ISSN
- 0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986323330
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Talanta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Keywords
- heavy metals, contaminated soil, sediment, extraction methods, metal mobility, sequential extraction, single extraction, certified reference materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
