Cited by 238Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeological and Geophysical Studies

The Grenville Orogenic Cycle (ca. 1350-1000 Ma): an Adirondack perspective

McLelland, James, Daly, J.Stephen, McLelland, Jonathan M.·1996·Tectonophysics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0040-1951(96)00144-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-grade Ottawan metamorphism is present in the Adirondack Highlands, possibly overprinting an earlier metamorphism of Shawinigan age.

    “the presence of high-grade Ottawan metamorphism in the Adirondack Highlands (e.g., McLelland et al. 2001, possibly overprinting an earlier metamorphism of Shawinigan age, McLelland et al. 1996)”
  • In the vicinity of cross-section A, regional-scale ductile extensional flow along subhorizontal fabrics in the southern Parautochthonous belt at c. 1020 Ma and in the Adirondacks at c. 1060-1030 Ma indicates the presence of abnormally hot crust in these areas, and may imply bulk crustal thinning.

    “In the vicinity of cross-section A, regional-scale ductile extensional flow along subhorizontal fabrics in the southern Parautochthonous belt at c45 1020 Ma (Culshaw et al. 1994; Ketchum et al. 1998) and in the Adirondacks at c45 1060-1030 Ma (McLelland et al. 1996) indicates the presence of abnormally hot crust in these areas, and may imply bulk crustal thinning.”
  • Displacement on the northwest-dipping Carthage-Colton mylonite zone, which marks the boundary between Frontenac and Adirondack terranes, has been dated at c. 1000-930 Ma.

    “whereas displacement on the northwest-dipping Carthage-Colton mylonite zone, which marks the boundary between Frontenac and Adirondack terranes, has been dated at c45 1000-930 Ma (McLelland et al. 1996; Magloughlin et al. 1997).”
  • The province-wide Ottawa orogeny was a result of continent-continent collision.

    “If the province-wide Ottawa orogeny was a result of continent-continent collision, as is commonly inferred (e.g., McLelland et al. 1996, 2001; Rivers 1997; Carr et al. 2000)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLelland, J., Daly, J. S., & McLelland, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Colgate University (US)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
McLelland, James
Venue
Tectonophysics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
265
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-28
ISSN
0040-1951 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125465308
Cited by
238
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tectonophysics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
Adirondack Mountains, Ottawan orogeny, Central Metasedimentary Belt, crustal delamination, orogen collapse, crustal extension, Midcontinent Rift, A-type granite, exhumation, Grenville Province

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review