Cited by 124Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeological and Geophysical Studies

The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation

Rivers, Toby, Ketchum, John, Indares, Aphrodite, Hynes, Andrew·2002·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

We propose that the Grenvillian allochthonous terranes may be grouped into High Pressure (HP) and Low Pressure (LP) belts and examine the HP belt in detail in the western and central Grenville Province. The HP belt is developed in Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic rocks of the pre-Grenvillian Laurentian margin and characterized by Grenvillian eclogite and co-facial HP granulite in mafic rocks. Pressure–temperature (P–T) estimates for eclogite-facies conditions in well-preserved assemblages are about 1800 MPa and 850°C. In the central Grenville Province, HP rocks formed at ~1060–1040 Ma and underwent a single stage of unroofing with transport into the upper crust by ~1020 Ma, whereas farther west they underwent two stages of unroofing separated by penetrative mid-crustal recrystallization before transport to the upper crust at ~1020 Ma. Unroofing processes were comparable in the two areas, involving both thrusting and extensional faulting in an orogen propagating into its foreland by understacking. In detail, thrusting episodes preceded extension in the western Grenville Province, whereas in the central Grenville Province, they were coeval, resulting in unroofing by tectonic extrusion. In the central Grenville Province, the footwall ramp is well preserved, but any former ramp in the western Grenville Province was obliterated by later lower crustal extensional flow. Continuation of the HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province is not established, but likely on geological grounds. However, the pattern of deep crustal seismic reflection in the Lithoprobe Eastern Canadian Shield Onshore–Offshore Transect (ECSOOT) line contrasts with that father west, suggesting that, if present, the HP rocks were exhumed by a different mechanism.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper defines a Grenvillian High Pressure (HP) belt as a first-order tectonic element of the Grenville Province and compares its architecture, timing, and exhumation in the western and central Grenville Province. It argues that HP rocks formed in Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic Laurentian margin rocks, reached eclogite-facies conditions of about 1800 MPa and 850°C, and were unroofed by foreland-propagating thrusting and extension, with a single-stage path in the central province and a two-stage path in the western province.

Key findings

  • The HP belt occurs along the interface between the Parautochthonous and Allochthonous belts, about 30–150 km from the Grenville Front, and consists mainly of Grenvillian eclogite and co-facial HP granulite in mafic rocks; Archean rocks are restricted to its footwall.
  • Well-preserved eclogite-facies assemblages give P-T estimates of about 1800 MPa and 850°C; central Grenville maximum estimates are 1700–1900 MPa and 850–925°C, with Molson Lake terrane ranging from 1400 MPa/750°C in the north to 1800 MPa/850°C farther south, and Lelukuau–Tshenukutish terranes at 1400–1900 MPa and 770–920°C.
  • In the central Grenville Province, HP rocks formed at c. 1060–1040 Ma and underwent a single stage of unroofing into the upper crust by c. 1020 Ma; farther west, HP metamorphism was earlier but poorly dated, and unroofing occurred in two stages separated by penetrative mid-crustal recrystallization before transport to the upper crust at c. 1020 Ma.
  • Unroofing involved both thrusting and extensional faulting in an orogen propagating into its foreland by understacking; in the western Grenville Province thrusting preceded extension, whereas in the central Grenville Province they were coeval, producing unroofing by tectonic extrusion. The central footwall ramp is preserved, but any western ramp was obliterated by later lower crustal extensional flow.

Methods

  • The paper is a synthesis/overview that compiles published petrology, P-T estimates, U/Pb geochronology, field relations, maps, and cross-sections to compare HP rocks in the western and central Grenville Province, two areas over 800 km apart.
  • It uses five crustal-scale cross-sections largely based on Lithoprobe seismic reflection profiles, together with metamorphic maps and lithologic linkages, to interpret the architecture and tectonic evolution of the HP belt.
  • The main analysis integrates spatial distribution, petrography, P-T conditions, ages, and structural architecture to evaluate mechanisms of HP rock formation and unroofing.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the timing of HP metamorphism in the western Grenville Province remains controversial despite detailed U/Pb study, that many results are not open to unequivocal interpretation, and that additional geochronological data are needed, especially in the western Grenville Province.
  • It states that continuation of the HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province is not established, that the ECSOOT seismic pattern contrasts with that farther west, and that if HP rocks are present there, their exhumation mechanism must have differed.
  • Evident from the text: the synthesis relies on existing data and seismic interpretations, some cross-sections are unconstrained by seismic imaging (e.g., cross-section E), and the age of HP metamorphism in Molson Lake terrane is not well constrained.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e02-025

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

20 of 232 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 4

    SL1 is adjacent to the Grenville Front.

    “In the northwestern part of the Grenville Province in Ontario (Fig. 2), the architecture, metamorphism and interrelationships of terranes and domains have been investigated in detail and the threefold lithotectonic subdivision shown in Fig. 1 has been refined into at least six structural levels (SLs; e.g., Culshaw et al. 1997; Ketchum and Davidson 2000), with the lowest (SL1) being adjacent to the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Culshaw et al. 1997 source

      Section 2.2 (page unavailable) says the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone abuts the foreland along the Grenville Front, supporting the location of the frontmost zone. The paper does not identify that zone as “SL1” or use the citing document’s structural-level numbering, so it does not establish the specific SL1 attribution. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ketchum and Davidson 2000 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 2

    Contractional displacements on front-parallel structures have resulted in a rise in metamorphic grade towards the interior of the orogen.

    “Grenvillian planar fabrics in the Parautochthonous belt are generally subparallel to the Grenville Front, and contractional displacements on frontparallel structures have resulted in a rise in metamorphic grade towards the interior of the orogen (Haggart et al. 1993; Rivers et al. 1993; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Haggart et al. 1993 source

      The Introduction (page not available) describes an increase in metamorphic grade inward from the Grenville Front, and the Tectonic Interpretation links convergence and shear-zone movement to exhumation. But its conclusions say the high-grade assemblages in the western Grenville Front Tectonic Zone predate Grenvillian deformation and were exhumed with little or no metamorphic overprinting. The paper therefore supports the spatial grade pattern and a role for deformation in exposing it, not the stronger implication that contractional displacement produced the higher metamorphic grade. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rivers et al. 1993 source
    • cites Jamieson et al. 1995 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 4

    In the northwestern part of the Grenville Province in Ontario, the threefold lithotectonic subdivision shown in Fig. 1 has been refined into at least six structural levels (SLs).

    “In the northwestern part of the Grenville Province in Ontario (Fig. 2), the architecture, metamorphism and interrelationships of terranes and domains have been investigated in detail and the threefold lithotectonic subdivision shown in Fig. 1 has been refined into at least six structural levels (SLs; e.g., Culshaw et al. 1997; Ketchum and Davidson 2000), with the lowest (SL1) being adjacent to the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Culshaw et al. 1997 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes the three major divisions of the Grenville Province in Ontario, then identifies the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone and five first-order subdivisions of the Central Gneiss Belt along the Georgian Bay transect. This supports a more detailed subdivision of the northwestern area, but the paper does not identify those six units as numbered structural levels (SLs). (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ketchum and Davidson 2000 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 2

    Grenvillian planar fabrics in the Parautochthonous belt are generally subparallel to the Grenville Front.

    “Grenvillian planar fabrics in the Parautochthonous belt are generally subparallel to the Grenville Front, and contractional displacements on frontparallel structures have resulted in a rise in metamorphic grade towards the interior of the orogen (Haggart et al. 1993; Rivers et al. 1993; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Haggart et al. 1993 source

      The Tectonic Interpretation (p. 585) says that fabrics outside shear zones are parallel to those within them, but does not relate their orientation to the Grenville Front. The Introduction discusses the Front and the Parautochthonous Belt without stating that planar fabrics in the belt are generally subparallel to the Front. Searches for front-parallel fabrics and foliation did not establish the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rivers et al. 1993 source
    • cites Jamieson et al. 1995 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 4

    SL6 includes terranes and domains of the Composite Arc and Frontenac-Adirondack belts.

    “In the northwestern part of the Grenville Province in Ontario (Fig. 2), the architecture, metamorphism and interrelationships of terranes and domains have been investigated in detail and the threefold lithotectonic subdivision shown in Fig. 1 has been refined into at least six structural levels (SLs; e.g., Culshaw et al. 1997; Ketchum and Davidson 2000), with the lowest (SL1) being adjacent to the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Culshaw et al. 1997 source

      The Figure 2 caption (page unavailable) identifies the Parry Sound domain as originally associated with CMB magmatic arcs, supporting the Composite Arc portion in broad terms. The copy does not identify an SL6 or place Frontenac-Adirondack terranes and domains within it; searches for “SL6” and “Frontenac Adirondack” did not establish those parts of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ketchum and Davidson 2000 source
  • May combine two claims. 122
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 46
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Muskoka domain · p. 6

    Muskoka domain underwent granulite-facies metamorphism during the Ottawa orogeny at c. 1080-1065 Ma, coeval with that in the adjacent Algonquin terrane.

    “Muskoka domain underwent granulite-facies metamorphism during the Ottawa orogeny at c45 1080-1065 Ma (Culshaw et al. 1997; Timmermann et al. 1997), coeval with that in the adjacent Algonquin terrane.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Culshaw et al. 1997 source

      Section 4.5 (page unavailable) says high-grade metamorphism did not affect Muskoka before approximately 1080 Ma and that Muskoka migmatites formed and deformed around 1080 Ma. It does not establish granulite-facies conditions in Muskoka, a 1080–1065 Ma interval for that domain, or coeval metamorphism in the adjacent Algonquin terrane. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Timmermann et al. 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 6

    Upper amphibolite- and granulite-facies metamorphism in Parry Sound domain has been dated at c. 1160 Ma and c. 1120 Ma, predating that in the underlying Algonquin terrane, although retrogression to amphibolite-facies assemblages is widespread.

    “Upper amphiboliteand granulite-facies metamorphism in Parry Sound domain has been dated at c45 1160 Ma and c45 1120 Ma (van Breemen et al. 1986; Tuccillo et al. 1992), predating that in the underlying Algonquin terrane, although retrogression to amphibolite-facies assemblages is widespread (Culshaw et al. 1997).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites van Breemen et al. 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tuccillo et al. 1992 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Culshaw et al. 1997 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Other normal-sense shear zones · p. 18

    Other normal faults separate domains of different cooling history, so must be essentially posttectonic, e.g., c. 960-930 Ma displacement on the Robertson Lake and Mooroton shear zones.

    “Other normal faults separate domains of different cooling history, so must be essentially posttectonic, e.g., c45 960-930 Ma displacement on the Robertson Lake and Mooroton shear zones (Mezger et al. 1993; Busch et al. 1996; Cureton et al. 1997).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mezger et al. 1993 source

      The Robertson Lake shear zone section describes a boundary between domains with different thermal histories, and the Mooroton shear zone section reports different cooling ages and differential uplift across that fault (pages unavailable in our copy). But the paper explicitly says no age information is available for shearing along Robertson Lake; it does not establish 960–930 Ma displacement on both zones or identify both as essentially posttectonic normal faults. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Busch et al. 1996 source
    • cites Cureton et al. 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 15

    The Parry Sound shear zone, with estimated timing of thrust displacement 1160-1120 Ma, is an exception to the general northwest-younging pattern.

    “The Parry Sound shear zone, for which the estimated timing of thrust displacement is 1160-1120 Ma (van Breemen et al. 1986; Tuccillo et al. 1992), is an exception to this pattern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites van Breemen et al. 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tuccillo et al. 1992 source

      The GEOCHRONOLOGY passage dates syn-deformational pegmatites in the Parry Sound Shear Zone to 1159–1121 Ma, supporting thrust activity around 1160–1120 Ma. But the DISCUSSION says thrusting began around 1160 Ma and lasted past 1078 Ma, so 1160–1120 Ma does not capture its full estimated duration. The passages do not assess whether the zone is an exception to the citing paper’s northwest-younging pattern. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Other normal-sense shear zones · p. 18

    Regional extension in the vicinity of cross-section D in the interval c. 1050-1015 Ma has been proposed, associated with mafic and felsic magmatism inferred to be related to delamination of the lower lithosphere.

    “Regional extension in the vicinity of cross-section D in the interval c45 1050-1015 Ma has also been proposed; in this area extension was associated with mafic and felsic magmatism inferred to be related to delamination of the lower lithosphere (Indares et al. 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares et al. 1998 source

      Section 7.2 describes extension in the Manicouagan Imbricate Zone, mafic magmatism around 1039 Ma, and a proposed link between removal of lithospheric mantle and rising asthenosphere. It dates the extension associated with postmetamorphic granite to 1017–1007 Ma, however, and does not establish that both mafic and felsic magmatism accompanied regional extension throughout 1050–1015 Ma. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 22

    At the beginning of the Rigolet orogeny (c. 1010 Ma), the orogen again went into compression, and the orogenic wedge propagated into its foreland.

    “At the beginning of the Rigolet orogeny ( c45 1010 Ma, Fig. 12D), the orogen again went into compression, and the orogenic wedge propagated into its foreland (Haggart et al. 1993; van Gool and Cawood 1994).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Haggart et al. 1993 source

      The Tectonic Interpretation describes a stage of convergence and migration of a shear zone toward the foreland in the study area. It places that migration at about 980 Ma, however, not at the claimed beginning of the Rigolet orogeny around 1010 Ma; it also says the implications for the orogen as a whole remain uncertain. The cited passages have no page number in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites van Gool and Cawood 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    There are significant along-strike contrasts in the orogen.

    “However, there are also significant along-strike contrasts that are discussed in more detail later in the text.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Terminology · p. 2

    The terranes that make up the HP belt experienced Grenvillian metamorphic histories very different from those of the terranes currently adjacent to them.

    “However, they experienced Grenvillian metamorphic histories very different from those of the terranes currently adjacent to them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The Algonquin metagabbro contains unreacted olivine and plagioclase and lacks omphacite.

    “The presence of unreacted olivine and plagioclase and the absence of omphacite is open to two alternative interpretations”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Molson Lake terrane · p. 7

    The age of HP metamorphism in Molson Lake terrane is not well constrained; two U/Pb (zircon) lower intercept ages of 1001 ± 10 Ma obtained on Shabogamo gabbro and Labradorian granite from the interior of the terrane are inferred to be minimum ages.

    “The age of HP metamorphism in Molson Lake terrane is not well constrained; two U/Pb (zircon) lower intercept ages of 1001 ± 10 Ma (Connelly and Heaman 1993) obtained on Shabogamo gabbro and Labradorian granite from the interior of the terrane are inferred to be minimum ages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Connelly and Heaman 1993 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § HP belt · p. 5

    There are two klippen situated northwest of the main area of outcrop.

    “In addition, there are two klippen situated northwest of the main area of outcrop (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Summary · p. 9

    Timing of the main metamorphism in hanging wall terranes structurally above the HP belt (LP belt, most of Composite Arc belt, and Frontenac but not Adirondack belt) varies from ~1650 Ma to 1470 Ma (Labradorian and Pinwarian orogenies) in the central Grenville Province and from ~1250 Ma (Elzevirian orogeny) to 1160 Ma (Shawinigan orogeny) in the western Grenville Province.

    “Timing of the main metamorphism in hanging wall terranes structurally above the HP belt, i.e., the terranes composing the LP belt, most of the Composite Arc belt and the Frontenac (but not Adirondack) belt, varies from c45 1650 Ma to 1470 Ma (Labradorian and Pinwarian orogenies, respectively) in the central Grenville Province and from c45 1250 Ma (Elzevirian orogeny) to 1160 Ma (Shawinigan orogeny”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Summary · p. 10

    Eclogites formed in mafic rocks with Paleoproterozoic (c45 1630 Ma) and Mesoproterozoic (c45 1470-1403 Ma) protolith ages.

    “Eclogites formed in mafic rocks with Paleoproterozoic ( c45 1630 Ma) and Mesoproterozoic ( c45 1470-1403 Ma) protolith ages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Occurrence, petrography, and P-T estimates of HP rocks · p. 10

    Mafic dykes exhibit considerable along-strike continuity, and an eclogite-facies isograd has been mapped, attesting to the greater structural integrity of the HP terrane.

    “Mafic dykes exhibit considerable along-strike continuity, and an eclogite-facies isograd has been mapped, attesting to the greater structural integrity of the HP terrane.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 14

    The Allochthon Boundary thrust lies some 30-150 km southeast of the Grenville Front, and its highly lobate surface trace is compatible with field evidence that it dips shallowly on a regional scale.

    “It lies some 30-150 km southeast of the Grenville Front, and its highly lobate surface trace is compatible with field evidence that it dips shallowly on a regional scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Central Grenville Province · p. 10

    Jadeitic pyroxene in both coronitic and granoblastic eclogite is locally preserved, with up to 51 mol.% jadeite in corona gabbro in Molson Lake terrane and 33 mol.% jadeite in granoblastic eclogite in Tshenukutish terrane.

    “jadeitic pyroxene in both coronitic and granoblastic eclogite is locally preserved, e.g., up to 51 mol.% jadeite in corona gabbro in Molson Lake terrane (Indares 1993; Indares and Rivers 1995), and 33 mol.% jadeite in granoblastic eclogite in Tshenukutish terrane (Cox and Indares 1999 a ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Indares 1993 source
    • cites Indares and Rivers 1995 source
    • cites Cox and Indares 1999 a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 14

    Several southeast-dipping, crustal-scale contractional structures link the cross-sections along the length of the Grenville Province, whereas others are restricted to one or two cross-sections.

    “Several southeast-dipping, crustal-scale contractional structures link the cross-sections (Fig. 9) along the length of the Grenville Province, whereas others are restricted to one or two of them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Summary · p. 8

    There is evidence for Ottawan (~1060-1020 Ma) metamorphism in the southern part of the Parautochthonous belt in the western Grenville Province, which may extend across the orogen.

    “However, there is also evidence for Ottawan ( c45 1060-1020 Ma) metamorphism in the southern part of the Parautochthonous belt in the western Grenville Province, which may extend across the orogen.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Central Grenville Province · p. 10

    In Molson Lake terrane, relict igneous plagioclase in Shabogamo gabbro is commonly choked with inclusions of corundum and (or) kyanite, or less commonly spinel, and corona assemblages are widespread.

    “In Molson Lake terrane, relict igneous plagioclase in Shabogamo gabbro is commonly choked with inclusions of corundum and (or) kyanite, or less commonly spinel, and corona assemblages are widespread.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 14

    The Allochthon Boundary thrust marks the boundary between the parautochthonous and allochthonous belts and carries the HP and LP belts in its hanging wall.

    “The southeast-dipping Allochthon Boundary thrust , which marks the boundary between the parautochthonous and allochthonous belts, carries the HP and LP belts in its hanging wall (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 14

    The Grenville Front and the Allochthon Boundary thrust in the northwest of the orogen are crust-penetrating structures present on all cross-sections, with the Allochthon Boundary thrust carrying the HP belt in its hanging wall.

    “The Grenville Front and the Allochthon Boundary thrust in the northwest of the orogen are crust-penetrating structures present on all cross-sections, with the latter carrying the HP belt in its hanging wall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    Typical corona mineralogy in Algonquin metagabbro consists of shells of orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, and garnet-clinopyroxene symplectite separating olivine and plagioclase, and spinel clouding in relict igneous plagioclase is widespread.

    “Typical corona mineralogy consists of shells of orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, and garnet-clinopyroxene symplectite separating olivine and plagioclase, and spinel clouding in relict igneous plagioclase is widespread (Fig. 7B; Davidson 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davidson 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Central Grenville Province · p. 10

    Pyroxenes in other spatially associated HP rocks have low jadeite contents due to low Na bulk compositional controls and are strictly HP granulites.

    “However, pyroxenes in other spatially associated HP rocks have low jadeite contents due to low Na bulk compositional controls and are strictly HP granulites (Indares 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares 1993 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    It has not proven possible to estimate the maximum P-T conditions attained by the retrogressed eclogites.

    “It has not proven possible to estimate the maximum P-T conditions attained by the retrogressed eclogites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Lithologic linkages · p. 14

    Shabogamo gabbro is restricted to the Parautochthonous belt in the Manicouagan area.

    “(6) Shabogamo gabbro is restricted to the Parautochthonous belt in the Manicouagan area”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Summary · p. 9

    All hanging-wall terranes preserve pre-Ottawan metamorphic ages and lack widespread, penetrative Ottawan metamorphism.

    “Common to all the hanging-wall terranes is the preservation of pre-Ottawan metamorphic ages, with the concomitant lack of widespread, penetrative Ottawan metamorphism, implying that they must have been in the upper crust at the time their footwalls were undergoing HP metamorphism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Occurrence, petrography, and P-T estimates of HP rocks · p. 10

    Retrogressed eclogite is restricted to the HP belt proper, whereas Algonquin metagabbros occur in both the HP belt and Muskoka domain.

    “Note that retrogressed eclogite is restricted to the HP belt proper, whereas Algonquin metagabbros occur in both the HP belt and Muskoka domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 15

    Displacement on the Maberly shear zone (the southwesterly segment of the Frontenac-Adirondack boundary thrust zone) is dated at c. 1170 Ma, overlaps with the age of metamorphism in the hanging wall, and may be representative of the thrust zone as a whole.

    “Displacement on Maberly shear zone (the southwesterly segment of FrontenacAdirondack boundary thrust zone, Fig. 2), which has been dated at c45 1170 Ma (Corfu and Easton 1997), overlaps with the age of metamorphism in the hanging wall and may be representative of the thrust zone as a whole.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Corfu and Easton 1997 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Summary · p. 10

    Eclogite is well documented in c45 1170 Ma gabbro in the central Grenville Province.

    “In addition, eclogite is well documented in c45 1170 Ma gabbro in the central Grenville Province”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    The relict igneous texture and the presence of igneous plagioclase and olivine in many samples, together with the lack of omphacite, contrast texturally and mineralogically with the relict eclogite.

    “As noted earlier, the relict igneous texture and the presence of igneous plagioclase and olivine in many samples, together with the lack of omphacite, contrast texturally and mineralogically with the relict eclogite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 14

    Evidence for northwest-directed, reverse displacement on the Composite Arc boundary thrust zone is widespread and has been bracketed between 1080 and 1050 Ma.

    “Evidence for northwest-directed, reverse displacement is widespread and has been bracketed between 1080 and 1050 Ma (Timmermann et al. 1997).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Timmermann et al. 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 8

    Metamorphic pressure during the Rigolet orogeny was estimated to be below 700 MPa in Hart Jaune terrane and no greater than 900 MPa in Berthé terrane.

    “Metamorphic pressure during the Rigolet orogeny was estimated to be below 700 MPa in Hart Jaune terrane and no greater than 900 MPa in Berthé terrane (Hynes and St-Jean 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hynes and St-Jean 1997
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Architecture of the HP belt · p. 17

    In cross-section C, only the ramp is visible on the cross-section, and the flat outcrops just west of the line of the cross-section.

    “in C, although only the ramp is visible on the cross-section, the flat outcrops just west of the line of the cross-section.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Mid-Parautochthon detachment system · p. 17

    In cross-section A, the Mid-Parautochthon detachment system is known as the Boundary shear, a broad, moderately dipping zone of intensely flattened ductile gneiss in which oblique-normal kinematic indicators overprint older thrust structures.

    “In A, where it is known as the Boundary shear, it is a broad, moderately dipping zone of intensely flattened ductile gneiss in which oblique-normal kinematic indicators overprint older thrust structures (Jamieson et al. 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jamieson et al. 1995 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Upper Allochthon detachment system · p. 17

    The Upper Allochthon detachment system is defined in the central Grenville Province from the map pattern and cross-sections D and E.

    “The Upper Allochthon detachment system is defined in the central Grenville Province from the map pattern (Fig. 3) and cross-sections D and E (Fig. 10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Other normal-sense shear zones · p. 18

    Other normal-sense shear zones and/or extensional deformation can be divided into two types on the basis of scale.

    “Other normal-sense shear zones and (or) extensional deformation can be divided into two types on the basis of scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Architecture and significance of the detachment systems · p. 18

    A ramp-flat geometry is developed in the Allochthon Boundary detachment in cross-section C, but it is not clear if this is an original feature or a result of later imbrication in its footwall.

    “A ramp-flat geometry is developed in the Allochthon Boundary detachment in cross-section C (Fig. 10), but as noted earlier, it is not clear if this is an original feature or a result of later imbrication in its footwall (Martignole et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martignole et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Allochthon Boundary detachment system · p. 17

    In cross-sections A and C, the Allochthon Boundary detachment shear zones follow the location of the Allochthon Boundary thrust at the base of the HP belt, and in C may offset the Moho.

    “In A and C, these shear zones follow the location of the Allochthon Boundary thrust at the base of the HP belt, and in C may offset the Moho (Fig. 10; Martignole et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martignole et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Allochthon Boundary detachment system · p. 17

    Farther east, the Allochthon Boundary detachment shear zones are located higher up the structural section; in cross-section D the Relay-Tshenukutish shear zone bisects the HP belt and in cross-section E the Lac Émérillon shear zone is situated at the upper boundary of the HP belt.

    “Farther east, however, they are located higher up the structural section; in D the Relay-Tshenukutish shear zone bisects the HP belt and in E the Lac Émérillon shear zone is situated at the upper boundary of the HP belt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Other normal-sense shear zones · p. 18

    In cross-section A, the Bancroft shear zone comprises disconnected subparallel strands of ductile mylonite, for which time of (probably minor) displacement has been dated at c. 1020 Ma.

    “In cross-section A, for instance, Bancroft shear zone comprises disconnected subparallel strands of ductile mylonite (Carr and McMullen 2000), for which time of (probably minor) displacement has been dated at c45 1020 Ma (van der Pluijm and Carlson 1989)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carr and McMullen 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites van der Pluijm and Carlson 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    Archean rocks are everywhere restricted to the footwall of the HP belt.

    “(6) Archean rocks are everywhere restricted to the footwall of the HP belt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 15

    The age of metamorphism generally youngs towards the northwest, such that terranes and domains with Elzevirian and Shawinigan metamorphic signatures generally lie to the southeast and structurally above those with Ottawan and Rigolet signatures.

    “Fig. 9 shows that the age of metamorphism also generally youngs towards the northwest, such that terranes and domains with Elzevirian and Shawinigan metamorphic signatures generally lie to the southeast and structurally above those with Ottawan and Rigolet signatures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    The HP belt has a ramp-flat geometry in the central Grenville Province, but dips gradually to the Moho in the western Grenville Province.

    “(5) The HP belt has a ramp-flat geometry in the central Grenville Province, but dips gradually to the Moho in the western Grenville Province.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Upper Allochthon detachment system · p. 17

    Hynes et al. (2000) showed that the southwesterly continuation of the Hart Jaune shear zone (the Highway shear zone) was imaged in the Lithoprobe deep seismic reflection experiment and could be traced to at least 10 km below the present erosion surface.

    “Hynes et al. (2000) showed that its southwesterly continuation (known as Highway shear zone) was imaged in the Lithoprobe deep seismic reflection experiment and could be traced to at least 10 km below the present erosion surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hynes et al. (2000) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    In the western Grenville Province, HP metamorphism was somewhat earlier than in the central Grenville Province, although its timing is not well constrained.

    “whereas in the western Grenville Province it was somewhat earlier, although its timing is not well constrained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Mid-Parautochthon detachment system · p. 17

    The surface expression of the Mid-Parautochthon detachment system is only recognized in cross-sections A and C and lies a few tens of kilometres southeast of the Grenville Front.

    “The surface expression of the Mid-Parautochthon detachment system, which is only recognized in cross-sections A and C, lies a few tens of kilometres southeast of the Grenville Front.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Evolution of cross-section E · p. 20

    Thin-skinned imbrication of the Paleoproterozoic supracrustal rocks on top of the Archean basement contrasted with thick-skinned imbrication of the underlying Archean rocks.

    “Thin-skinned imbrication of the Paleoproterozoic supracrustal rocks on top of the Archean basement contrasted with thick-skinned imbrication of the underlying Archean rocks”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Architecture and significance of the detachment systems · p. 18

    The Mid-Parautochthon and Allochthon Boundary detachment systems in cross-section A are both situated beneath the HP belt.

    “Furthermore, the Mid-Parautochthon and Allochthon Boundary detachment systems in cross-section A are both situated beneath the HP belt”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    HP rocks in the western Grenville Province were transported to mid-crust levels and imbricated with Muskoka domain before undergoing granulite-facies metamorphism at c45 1080-1060 Ma.

    “(2) HP rocks in the western Grenville Province were transported to mid-crust levels and imbricated with Muskoka domain before undergoing granulite-facies metamorphism at c45 1080-1060 Ma.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Upper Allochthon detachment system · p. 17

    Farther east, the map pattern indicates that the Upper Allochthon detachment shear zone cuts down-section and merges with the Allochthon Boundary detachment system, locally completely excising the HP belt at the erosion surface.

    “Farther east, the map pattern indicates that the shear zone cuts down-section and merges with the Allochthon Boundary detachment system, locally completely excising the HP belt at the erosion surface, e.g., east of Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes and along the northern margin of Lac Joseph terrane (Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Architecture of the HP belt · p. 17

    In all cross-sections, Archean rocks are restricted to the parautochthonous footwall beneath the HP belt, and the HP belt is composed of units of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic age.

    “In all cross-sections, Archean rocks are restricted to the parautochthonous footwall beneath the HP belt, and the HP belt is composed of units of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic age (Fig. 8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    The Allochthon Boundary detachment system formed above the HP terranes in the central Grenville Province, whereas it formed below the HP terranes in the western Grenville Province.

    “(7) The Allochthon Boundary detachment system formed above the HP terranes in the central Grenville Province, whereas it formed below the HP terranes in the western Grenville Province.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    Out-of-sequence thrusting and metamorphism occurred in the Berthé terrane.

    “Out-of-sequence thrusting and metamorphism in Berthé terrane (BT).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    Out-of-sequence thrusting and metamorphism occurred in the Mazinaw domain.

    “Out-of-sequence thrusting and metamorphism in Mazinaw domain (MD).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 22

    Deformation and metamorphism during the Rigolet orogeny were restricted principally to the foreland region in the footwall of the HP belt and by inference to the base of the orogenic wedge, although they also occurred farther to the southeast in cross-section D.

    “Deformation and metamorphism were restricted principally to the foreland region in the footwall of the HP belt and by inference to the base of the orogenic wedge, although they also occurred farther to the southeast in cross-section D (Ludden and Hynes 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ludden and Hynes 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    The Allochthon Boundary detachment formed below the HP belt in the western Grenville Province and above the HP belt in the central Grenville Province.

    “Formation of the Allochthon Boundary detachment (ABD) below and above HP belt in the western and central Grenville Province respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Exhumation processes · p. 23

    In the western Grenville Province, major extensional shearing appears to have postdated crustal thickening by thrusting and to have taken place beneath the HP belt.

    “As noted in the western Grenville Province, major extensional shearing appears to have postdated crustal thickening by thrusting and to have taken place beneath the HP belt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    In the western Grenville Province, eclogites were uplifted to mid-crust along the Allochthon Boundary thrust, where they underwent granulite-facies metamorphism.

    “In the western Grenville Province, uplift of eclogites to mid-crust along the Allochthon Boundary thrust (ABT), where they undergo granulite-facies metamorphism (imbrication with Muskoka domain not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    In the central Grenville Province, tectonic burial of the inner Laurentian margin and formation of eclogite-facies rocks occurred.

    “In the central Grenville Province, tectonic burial of inner Laurentian margin and formation of eclogite-facies rocks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Continuation of HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province · p. 23

    All on-land crustal-scale seismic lines in the Grenville Province are characterized by gently southeast-dipping structures of inferred Grenvillian age, several of which are crust-penetrating and reach the Moho.

    “all the on-land crustal-scale seismic lines in the Grenville Province are characterized by gently southeast-dipping structures of inferred Grenvillian age, several of which are crust-penetrating and reach the Moho.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    The different timing of eclogite formation and the contrasting nature of the tectonic load on the HP belt are shown in Fig. 12A and 12B: Composite Arc and Frontenac-Adirondack belts in the western Grenville Province, the outer Laurentian margin in the central Grenville Province.

    “(A) and (B), The different timing of eclogite formation and the contrasting nature of the tectonic load on the HP belt (Composite Arc and Frontenac-Adirondack belts in the western Grenville Province, the outer Laurentian margin in the central Grenville Province) are shown.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    Ductile flow and bulk thinning occurred in the lower crust in the western Grenville Province.

    “Ductile flow and bulk thinning in the lower crust in the western Grenville Province.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    The Adirondack Highland terrane of the Frontenac-Adirondack belt underwent Ottawan metamorphism.

    “Adirondack Highland terrane (AHT) of Frontenac-Adirondack belt undergoes Ottawan metamorphism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    There is little evidence for the eclogite-facies stage in the HP belt itself, due to subsequent uplift of the HP rocks into the mid-crust and penetrative granulite-facies recrystallization at c45 1080-1060 Ma.

    “There is little evidence for this stage in the HP belt itself, however, due to the subsequent uplift of the HP rocks into the mid-crust and penetrative granulite-facies recrystallization at c45 1080-1060 Ma (Fig. 12B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    The Frontenac-Adirondack belt and contiguous parts of the Composite Arc belt carry evidence for penetrative deformation and greenschist- to granulite-facies metamorphism at 1190-1140 Ma (Shawinigan orogeny), suggesting that they were amalgamated at that time.

    “The Frontenac-Adirondack belt and contiguous parts of the Composite Arc belt carry evidence for penetrative deformation and greenschist- to granulite-facies metamorphism at 1190-1140 Ma (Shawinigan orogeny), suggesting that they were amalgamated at that time (Carr et al. 2000; Hanmer et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carr et al. 2000 source
    • cites Hanmer et al. 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 2

    The Parautochthonous belt is the lowest structural unit in the Grenville Province.

    “The Parautochthonous belt, the lowest structural unit in the Grenville Province, is composed of lithologic units that locally can be correlated with less deformed and metamorphosed equivalent units in the foreland to the northwest of the orogen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    Recognition of the HP belt as a first order tectonic element of the Grenville Province suggests that this subdivision can be usefully revised to facilitate understanding of Grenvillian tectonics.

    “Recognition of the HP belt as a first order tectonic element of the Grenville Province suggests that this subdivision can be usefully revised to facilitate understanding of Grenvillian tectonics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § [The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation 1](http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/rp/rppdf/e02-904.pdf) · p. 1

    In the central Grenville Province, coeval thrusting and extension resulted in unroofing by tectonic extrusion.

    “In detail, thrusting episodes preceded extension in the western Grenville Province, whereas in the central Grenville Province, they were coeval, resulting in unroofing by tectonic extrusion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 2

    All three belts were defined on the basis of their Grenvillian tectonometamorphic signatures.

    “All three belts were defined on the basis of their Grenvillian tectonometamorphic signatures (Rivers et al. 1989; Ludden and Hynes 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rivers et al. 1989 source
    • cites Ludden and Hynes 2000 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Terminology · p. 2

    All eclogites imply P > c. 1400 MPa.

    “However, all eclogites imply P > c45 1400 MPa, so this may be considered an arbitrary lower pressure limit for the rocks in the HP belt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spear 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Terminology · p. 2

    The terranes that make up the HP belt were part of the Mesoproterozoic Laurentian margin prior to Grenvillian orogenesis and were not exotic.

    “The terranes that make up the HP belt are inferred to have been part of the Mesoproterozoic Laurentian margin prior to Grenvillian orogenesis and thus were not exotic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    Rivers et al. (1989) originally distinguished two allochthonous belts on the basis of the presence or absence of a pre-Elzevirian and (or) Grenvillian metamorphic history.

    “Rivers et al. (1989) originally distinguished two allochthonous belts on the basis of the presence or absence of a pre-Elzevirian and (or) Grenvillian metamorphic history.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rivers et al. (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    With respect to the tectonic subdivision of Carr et al. (2000), the Parautochthonous, HP, and LP belts are all components of their 'Laurentia and Laurentian Margin.'

    “With respect to the tectonic subdivision of Carr et al. (2000), the Parautochthonous, HP, and LP belts are all components of their 'Laurentia and Laurentian Margin.'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carr et al. (2000) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    The boundaries of the HP belt are first-order structural features that were active during Grenvillian orogenesis.

    “The boundaries of the HP belt are first-order structural features that were active during Grenvillian orogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Terminology · p. 2

    Eclogite-facies assemblages develop at different P-T conditions depending upon the bulk composition of the rock.

    “It is well known that eclogite-facies assemblages develop at different P-T conditions depending upon the bulk composition of the rock (e.g., Spear 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spear 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Regional tectonic setting of the HP belt · p. 3

    Carr et al. (2000) subdivided the Allochthonous Monocyclic belt of Rivers et al. (1989) into the 'Composite Arc belt' and the 'Frontenac-Adirondack belt.'

    “Carr et al. (2000) subdivided the Allochthonous Monocyclic belt of Rivers et al. (1989) into the 'Composite Arc belt' and the 'Frontenac-Adirondack belt.'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carr et al. (2000) source
    • cites Rivers et al. (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Terminology · p. 2

    The rocks of the HP belt developed in a deep tectonic setting near the base of the doubly thickened orogenic crust.

    “Our aim is to focus attention on rocks that we infer developed in a deep tectonic setting near the base of the doubly thickened orogenic crust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § [The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation 1](http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/rp/rppdf/e02-904.pdf) · p. 1

    Unroofing processes were comparable in the western and central Grenville Province, involving both thrusting and extensional faulting in an orogen propagating into its foreland by understacking.

    “Unroofing processes were comparable in the two areas, involving both thrusting and extensional faulting in an orogen propagating into its foreland by understacking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § [The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation 1](http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/rp/rppdf/e02-904.pdf) · p. 1

    The Grenvillian allochthonous terranes can be grouped into High Pressure (HP) and Low Pressure (LP) belts.

    “We propose that the Grenvillian allochthonous terranes may be grouped into High Pressure (HP) and Low Pressure (LP) belts and examine the HP belt in detail in the western and central Grenville Province.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § [The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation 1](http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/rp/rppdf/e02-904.pdf) · p. 1

    Continuation of the HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province is not established but is likely on geological grounds.

    “Continuation of the HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province is not established, but likely on geological grounds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § HP belt · p. 7

    The HP belt comprises units of Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic age, and rocks of Archean age appear to be absent.

    “As in the western Grenville Province, the HP belt comprises units of Paleoto Mesoproterozoic age, and rocks of Archean age appear to be absent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Muskoka domain · p. 6

    Muskoka domain lacks supracrustal rocks or evidence for a polycyclic history, being composed of juvenile Mesoproterozoic (Pinwarian) units cut by Algonquin gabbro.

    “It differs from Algonquin terrane in that it lacks supracrustal rocks or evidence for a polycyclic history, being composed of juvenile Mesoproterozoic (Pinwarian) units cut by Algonquin gabbro (Timmermann et al. 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Timmermann et al. 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    U/Pb ages from relict eclogite bodies include a single determination of 1121 ± 10/12 Ma, six determinations of 1101-1069 Ma (all ± 4 Ma or less), and two less precise determinations of 1063 +48/-35 and 1048 ± 30 Ma.

    “Estimated ages include a single determination of 1121 -+ 10 12 Ma, six determinations of 1101-1069 Ma (all ± 4 Ma or less), and two less precise determinations of 1063 -+ 48 35 and 1048 ± 30 Ma (see Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Indares and Dunning 1997 source
    • cites Ketchum and Krogh 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ketchum and Krogh 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes · p. 7

    Both Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes consist primarily of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic metaplutonic rocks that formed at ~1690-1630 Ma and ~1450 Ma.

    “Both terranes consist primarily of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic metaplutonic rocks that formed at c45 1690-1630 Ma and c45 1450 Ma (Indares et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares et al. 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The retrogressed eclogite bodies contain undisputed evidence of their former HP character.

    “The retrogressed eclogite bodies contain undisputed evidence of their former HP character (see later in the text)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The authors prefer the interpretation that the timing of HP metamorphism in this part of the HP belt postdated intrusion of the Algonquin gabbro and slightly predated the granulite-facies recrystallization event.

    “In conclusion, the timing of HP metamorphism in this part of the HP belt remains controversial, but the authors prefer the interpretation that it postdated intrusion of the Algonquin gabbro and slightly predated the granulite-facies recrystallization event.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Algonquin metagabbro is 1170-1150 Ma.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The timing of HP metamorphism in the western Grenville Province remains controversial despite detailed U/Pb study.

    “The timing of HP metamorphism in the western Grenville Province remains controversial despite detailed U/Pb study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Central Grenville Province · p. 6

    The imbrication of terranes in the central Grenville Province shows many similarities to that farther west, although in detail the pattern appears to be simpler and only three structural levels have been identified.

    “The imbrication of terranes in the central Grenville Province (Fig. 3) shows many similarities to that farther west, although in detail the pattern appears to be simpler and only three structural levels have been identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 8

    Lac Joseph terrane comprises a thin sheet of Paleoproterozoic sedimentary and plutonic rocks metamorphosed to upper amphibolite- to granulite-facies migmatitic gneiss during the Labradorian orogeny, with a window near the centre of the terrane through which the underlying HP belt is exposed.

    “Lac Joseph terrane comprises a thin sheet of Paleoproterozoic sedimentary and plutonic rocks metamorphosed to upper amphibolite- to granulite-facies migmatitic gneiss during the Labradorian orogeny, with a window near the centre of the terrane through which the underlying HP belt is exposed (Fig. 3; Connelly and Heaman 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Connelly and Heaman 1993 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Parautochthonous belt · p. 6

    Subordinate rock types in Gagnon terrane include deformed and metamorphosed granitoid plutons and the distinctive 1459 ± 22/23 Ma Shabogamo gabbro, which forms sills and dykes in the Paleoproterozoic supracrustal succession.

    “Subordinate rock types include deformed and metamorphosed granitoid plutons and the distinctive 1459 -+ 22 23 Ma Shabogamo gabbro, which forms sills and dykes in the Paleoproterozoic supracrustal succession (Connelly and Heaman 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Connelly and Heaman 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 6

    Metamorphism in most of the Composite Arc belt took place during the Elzevirian orogeny, and metamorphism in the Frontenac part of the Frontenac-Adirondack belt took place in the Shawinigan orogeny.

    “Structurally up-section to the south, metamorphism in most of the Composite Arc belt took place during the Elzevirian orogeny (except for the basal Composite Arc boundary thrust zone, noted earlier, and Mazinaw domain, which record late Ottawan ages of metamorphism, Corfu and Easton 1995), and metamorphism in the Frontenac part of the Frontenac-Adirondack belt took place in the Shawinigan orogeny”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Corfu and Easton 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Carr et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § HP belt · p. 7

    The structurally overlying HP belt in the central Grenville Province consists of Molson Lake, Lelukuau, and Tshenukutish terranes, and may also include the poorly known Pambrun terrane farther west.

    “The structurally overlying HP belt in the central Grenville Province consists of Molson Lake, Lelukuau, and Tshenukutish terranes, and may also include the poorly known Pambrun terrane farther west (Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    Both the gabbro and its host rocks underwent a later granulite-facies metamorphism, dated by zircon formation at c. 1080-1060 Ma in leucosomes in the adjacent migmatites, but at 1060-1045 Ma in the gabbro.

    “Both the gabbro and its host rocks underwent a later granulite-facies metamorphism, as noted earlier, which is dated by zircon formation at c45 1080-1060 Ma in leucosomes in the adjacent migmatites (Bussy et al. 1995), but at 1060-1045 Ma in the gabbro (Davidson and van Breemen 1988).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bussy et al. 1995 source
    • cites Davidson and van Breemen 1988 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    There is some isotopic evidence that the Algonquin gabbro is a poor recorder of metamorphic conditions and by extension also of zircon-producing reactions and the time of metamorphism.

    “there is some isotopic evidence that the Algonquin gabbro is a poor recorder of metamorphic conditions and by extension, therefore, also of zircon-producing reactions and the time of metamorphism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 6

    The boundary between the Composite Arc belt and the structurally underlying units is a map-scale tectonic mélange referred to as the Composite Arc boundary thrust zone.

    “The boundary between the Composite Arc belt and the structurally underlying units is a map-scale tectonic mélange referred to here as the Composite Arc boundary thrust zone (Fig. 2; formerly Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone, Hanmer and Ciesielski 1984; renamed to be consistent with renaming of Central Metasedimentary belt to Composite Arc belt by Carr et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hanmer and Ciesielski 1984 source
    • cites Carr et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes · p. 7

    Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes, located on the north shore of Manicouagan Reservoir, comprise the Manicouagan Imbricate zone, and its mapped extension into the southern part of the reservoir is described by Eaton et al. (1995) and Hynes et al. (2000).

    “These terranes, located on the north shore of Manicouagan Reservoir, comprise the Manicouagan Imbricate zone (Indares et al. 1998, 2000), and its mapped extension into the southern part of the reservoir is described by Eaton et al. (1995) and Hynes et al. (2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Indares et al. 1998, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Eaton et al. (1995) source
    • cites Hynes et al. (2000) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § HP belt · p. 5

    The HP belt in Ontario and western Quebec, comprising SL2 and SL3 of Ketchum and Davidson (2000), is composed of a number of domains referred to here collectively as Algonquin terrane in Ontario and Lac Dumoine terrane in Quebec.

    “The HP belt in Ontario and western Quebec, comprising SL2 and SL3 of Ketchum and Davidson (2000), is composed of a number of domains referred to here collectively as Algonquin terrane in Ontario and Lac Dumoine terrane in Quebec.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ketchum and Davidson (2000) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 6

    The Composite Arc boundary thrust zone includes rocks as old as c. 1190-1180 Ma and may have undergone an early thrust history at about this time.

    “The Composite Arc boundary thrust zone includes rocks as old as c45 1190-1180 Ma and may have undergone an early thrust history at about this time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Molson Lake terrane · p. 7

    Molson Lake terrane consists principally of 1650 Ma granitoid gneisses, part of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Labrador batholith, cut by dykes of the Mesoproterozoic Shabogamo gabbro.

    “This terrane consists principally of 1650 Ma granitoid gneisses, part of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Labrador batholith (Connelly and Heaman 1993; Connelly et al. 1995), cut by dykes of the Mesoproterozoic Shabogamo gabbro.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Connelly and Heaman 1993 source
    • cites Connelly et al. 1995 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    In the Western Gneiss region of Norway, eclogitization of granulite-facies rocks is restricted to sheared and deformed zones, implying that strain and (or) hydrous fluids were essential to promote eclogite reactions despite appropriate P-T conditions.

    “This second possibility is in part based on evidence from the Western Gneiss region of Norway, in which eclogitization of granulite-facies rocks is restricted to sheared and deformed zones, implying that strain and (or) hydrous fluids were essential to promote eclogite reactions despite appropriate P-T conditions (Austrheim 1987).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Austrheim 1987 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The possibility that HP metamorphism predated emplacement of the 1170 Ma gabbro but is not recorded by U/Pb zircon data is at odds with the well-established pattern of metamorphic zircon growth during the first high P-T penetrative recrystallization event in mafic rocks, as no evidence of pre-1170 Ma zircon has been found in any analysed samples.

    “We consider ( iv ) to be at odds with the well-established pattern of metamorphic zircon growth during the first high P-T penetrative recrystallization event in mafic rocks, as no evidence of pre-1170 Ma zircon has been found in any of the analysed samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Algonquin metagabbro is 1170-1150 Ma.
    • Rests on an assumption: Metamorphic zircon growth occurs during the first high P-T penetrative recrystallization event in mafic rocks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes · p. 7

    Subordinate Mesoproterozoic plutonic units with ages ranging from 1300 to 1020 Ma are known in Lelukuau and Tshenukutish terranes, including several bodies of ~1214-1160 Ma Fe-Ti gabbro and anorthosite.

    “Subordinate Mesoproterozoic plutonic units with ages ranging from 1300 to 1020 Ma are known, including several bodies of c45 1214-1160 Ma Fe-Ti gabbro and anorthosite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § HP belt · p. 5

    The HP terranes consist of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic metagranitoid rocks emplaced during two magmatic episodes at c45 1715-1600 and c45 1470-1430 Ma.

    “The HP terranes, which appear to lack units of Archean age, consist of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic metagranitoid rocks emplaced during two magmatic episodes at c45 1715-1600 and c45 1470-1430 Ma (Krogh 1991; Nadeau and van Breemen 1998; Ketchum and Davidson 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Krogh 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nadeau and van Breemen 1998 source
    • cites Ketchum and Davidson 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Parautochthonous belt · p. 5

    In the southern Parautochthonous belt in Ontario, P-T conditions of c45 1200 MPa / 800°C, developed at c45 1060 Ma during the Ottawa orogeny, were followed by a period of isothermal decompression.

    “In the southern Parautochthonous belt in Ontario, P-T conditions of c45 1200 MPa / 800°C, developed at c45 1060 Ma during the Ottawa orogeny, were followed by a period of isothermal decompression (Anovitz and Essene 1990; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Anovitz and Essene 1990 source
    • cites Jamieson et al. 1995 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The question of whether the 1170-1150 Ma Algonquin metagabbro underwent the HP event remains contentious.

    “the question of whether the 1170-1150 Algonquin metagabbro underwent the HP event remains contentious.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Algonquin metagabbro is 1170-1150 Ma.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Age of HP metamorphism · p. 5

    The age difference between zircon formation in the gabbro and in the host gneisses indicates that the gabbro was much slower to react than the host gneisses, compatible with its coarse texture, dry mineralogy and lack of penetrative strain.

    “This age difference indicates that the gabbro was much slower to react than the host gneisses, compatible with its coarse texture, dry mineralogy and lack of penetrative strain”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Molson Lake terrane · p. 7

    There is a regional coherence to the pattern of HP metamorphism in Molson Lake terrane, with systematic variations in corona assemblages over several tens of kilometres, suggesting a progressive increase in P southwards.

    “Indares and Rivers (1995) showed that there is a regional coherence to the pattern of HP metamorphism in Molson Lake terrane and were able to map systematic variations in corona assemblages over a distance of several tens of kilometres, suggesting that there is a progressive increase in P southwards in the terrane.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares and Rivers (1995) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 6

    Most of the Composite Arc belt and the Frontenac segment of the Frontenac-Adirondack belt obtained their metamorphic signatures before the Ottawa orogeny; they lack evidence for the c. 1080-1040 Ma high P-T metamorphism that is pervasive in their immediate footwall.

    “This implies that most of the Composite Arc belt and the Frontenac segment of the Frontenac-Adirondack belt obtained their metamorphic signatures before the Ottawa orogeny; they lack evidence for the c45 1080-1040 Ma high P-T metamorphism that is so pervasive in their immediate footwall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary · p. 9

    In the western Grenville Province, HP metamorphism occurred earlier than in the central Grenville Province but is less well dated.

    “In contrast, in the western Grenville Province, where the HP metamorphism occurred earlier but is less well dated, the HP rocks were subsequently transported into the mid-crust, where they were imbricated with Muskoka domain and underwent penetrative granulite-facies recrystallization from c45 1080 to 1060 Ma (Ottawa orogeny).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    The original granoblastic, eclogite-facies mineralogy is extensively overprinted by granulite- and amphibolite-facies assemblages, but compelling evidence of former eclogite parageneses is preserved locally.

    “The original granoblastic, eclogite-facies mineralogy is extensively overprinted by granulite- and amphibolite-facies assemblages, but compelling evidence of former eclogite parageneses is preserved locally.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grant 1989 source
    • cites Davidson 1990, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Indares and Dunning 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 8

    Hart Jaune and Berthé terranes together comprise a north-vergent, fold-thrust stack, with the Berthé anorthosite occupying the core of a km-scale sheath fold in the centre of the stack.

    “Hart Jaune and Berthé terranes together comprise a north-vergent, fold-thrust stack, with the Berthé anorthosite occupying the core of a km-scale sheath fold in the centre of the stack (Hynes et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hynes et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    Coronitic metagabbro bodies of the Algonquin suite occur widely within the HP belt and Muskoka domain, some in close proximity to retrogressed eclogite.

    “Coronitic metagabbro bodies of the Algonquin suite occur widely within the HP belt and Muskoka domain, some in close proximity to retrogressed eclogite (Fig. 6A; Davidson 1991; Ketchum and Davidson 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Davidson 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ketchum and Davidson 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary · p. 10

    The authors are of the opinion that gabbro of c45 1170 Ma also experienced the HP event in the western Grenville Province.

    “and the authors are of the opinion that gabbro of this age also experienced the HP event in the western Grenville Province.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    Indares and Dunning (1997) calculated a P-T of 1350 MPa and 720°C from the retrogressed assemblage, which they inferred to represent conditions at some stage of the unroofing.

    “Indares and Dunning (1997) calculated a P-T of 1350 MPa and 720°C from the retrogressed assemblage, which they inferred to represent conditions at some stage of the unroofing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares and Dunning (1997) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Occurrence, petrography, and P-T estimates of HP rocks · p. 9

    The surrounding quartzofeldspathic gneisses also developed eclogite-facies assemblages, but they were thoroughly reequilibrated during decompression.

    “The implication is that the surrounding quartzofeldspathic gneisses also developed eclogite-facies assemblages, but that they were thoroughly reequilibrated during decompression (Davidson 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davidson 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Western Grenville Province · p. 10

    P-T estimates for the metamorphism of the Algonquin gabbro are 750-950 MPa and 650-750°C.

    “P-T estimates for the metamorphism of the Algonquin gabbro are 750-950 MPa and 650-750°C (Grant 1987)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grant 1987
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overlying LP terranes · p. 8

    Berthé terrane consists of layered, migmatitic gneisses that have yielded evidence for a metamorphic event at 1011-990 Ma (Rigolet orogeny).

    “Berthé terrane consists of layered, migmatitic gneisses that have yielded evidence for a metamorphic event at 1011-990 Ma (Rigolet orogeny, Scott and Hynes 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scott and Hynes 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Central Grenville Province · p. 10

    The corona sequence in Molson Lake terrane has been interpreted as a prograde sequence through the amphibolite-granulite transition to HP granulite- and co-facial eclogite-facies assemblages.

    “This has been interpreted as a prograde sequence through the amphibolite-granulite transition to HP granulite- and co-facial eclogite-facies assemblages (Fig. 6B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Allochthon Boundary detachment system · p. 17

    Normal displacement on the Allochthon Boundary detachment system appears to have been initiated in late Ottawan time, following unroofing of the HP belt, and to have continued episodically throughout the Rigolet orogeny.

    “Normal displacement thus appears to have been initiated in late Ottawan time, following unroofing of the HP belt, and to have continued episodically throughout the Rigolet orogeny.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evolution of cross-section E · p. 18

    Mesoproterozoic modifications to the architecture in the vicinity of cross-section E included continental-margin arc-related intrusions and supracrustal rocks and a prominent mafic dyke swarm (Shabogamo gabbro) that stitched several crustal elements.

    “Mesoproterozoic modifications to this architecture included continental-margin arc-related intrusions and supracrustal rocks (not shown) and a prominent mafic dyke swarm (Shabogamo gabbro) that stitched several of the crustal elements (Rivers 1997; Rivers and Corrigan 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rivers 1997 source
    • cites Rivers and Corrigan 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Mid-Parautochthon detachment system · p. 17

    The amount of displacement on the Boundary shear is unknown, but the lack of field evidence for a significant change in metamorphic grade on either side may imply that it was not large.

    “The amount of displacement is unknown, but the lack of field evidence for a significant change in metamorphic grade on either side may imply that it was not large.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Evolution of cross-section E · p. 20

    The imbrication of the future LP belt onto the HP belt was a thick-skinned thrusting process, because of the lack of penetrative Grenvillian deformation and metamorphism in Lac Joseph terrane in the LP belt.

    “We infer that this was a thick-skinned thrusting process because of the lack of penetrative Grenvillian deformation and metamorphism in Lac Joseph terrane in the LP belt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Allochthon Boundary detachment system · p. 17

    The location of the major normal-sense shear zone beneath the HP belt in the west, but above it in the east, places the HP belt in the hanging wall of the Allochthon Boundary detachment system in the west, but in its footwall farther east.

    “This relationship, which places the HP belt in the hanging wall of the Allochthon Boundary detachment system in the west, but in its footwall farther east”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    In the western Grenville Province, tectonic burial of the Laurentian margin accompanied approximate doubling of crustal thickness (c45 60 km) and the formation of the HP rocks.

    “The figure begins in the western Grenville Province with the tectonic burial of the Laurentian margin accompanying approximate doubling of crustal thickness ( c45 60 km) and the formation of the HP rocks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Origin of the tectonic loads · p. 16

    The HP belt went from an active metamorphic environment in the deep to very deep crust during the Ottawa orogeny to being passively transported in the mid- to upper crust during the Rigolet orogeny.

    “This indicates that the HP belt went from an active metamorphic environment in the deep to very deep crust during the Ottawa orogeny to being passively transported in the mid- to upper crust during the Rigolet orogeny”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A tectonic load on the HP belt gave rise to the HP metamorphism.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Architecture of the HP belt · p. 17

    Development of the ramp-flat geometry in cross-section D was instrumental in the unroofing of the HP rocks.

    “Hynes and Eaton (1999) considered that development of the ramp-flat geometry in cross-section D was instrumental in the unroofing of the HP rocks”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hynes and Eaton (1999) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Other normal-sense shear zones · p. 18

    In the vicinity of cross-section A, regional-scale ductile extensional flow along subhorizontal fabrics in the southern Parautochthonous belt at c. 1020 Ma and in the Adirondacks at c. 1060-1030 Ma indicates the presence of abnormally hot crust in these areas, and may imply bulk crustal thinning.

    “In the vicinity of cross-section A, regional-scale ductile extensional flow along subhorizontal fabrics in the southern Parautochthonous belt at c45 1020 Ma (Culshaw et al. 1994; Ketchum et al. 1998) and in the Adirondacks at c45 1060-1030 Ma (McLelland et al. 1996) indicates the presence of abnormally hot crust in these areas, and may imply bulk crustal thinning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Culshaw et al. 1994 source
    • cites Ketchum et al. 1998 source
    • cites McLelland et al. 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Architecture of the HP belt · p. 17

    Farther east there are no hard data on Ottawan metamorphism in the Parautochthonous belt, although evidence for HP metamorphism in Gagnon terrane may indicate that it is present there too.

    “and farther east there are no hard data, although the evidence for HP metamorphism in Gagnon terrane (Indares 1995) may indicate that it is present there too (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § First-order contractional structures · p. 15

    High-grade Ottawan metamorphism is present in the Adirondack Highlands, possibly overprinting an earlier metamorphism of Shawinigan age.

    “the presence of high-grade Ottawan metamorphism in the Adirondack Highlands (e.g., McLelland et al. 2001, possibly overprinting an earlier metamorphism of Shawinigan age, McLelland et al. 1996)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites McLelland et al. 2001 source
    • cites McLelland et al. 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Architecture of the HP belt · p. 17

    The lack of a ramp in cross-section A is coincident with the higher proportion of Proterozoic units in the lower crust there and may be a result of their inferred greater ductility.

    “The lack of a ramp in cross-section A is coincident with the higher proportion of Proterozoic units in the lower crust there and may therefore be a result of their inferred greater ductility (Ludden and Hynes 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ludden and Hynes 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Origin of the tectonic loads · p. 16

    The HP belt, Composite Arc belt, Frontenac-Adirondack belt, and much of the LP belt constituted the upper crustal load during the Rigolet orogeny and were transported passively towards the northwest at that time.

    “we infer that the HP belt, Composite Arc belt, Frontenac-Adirondack belt, and much of the LP belt constituted the upper crustal load during the Rigolet orogeny and were transported passively towards the northwest at that time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A tectonic load on the HP belt gave rise to the HP metamorphism.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Origin of the tectonic loads · p. 16

    The units making up the tectonic load were passively transported above a ductile lower crust (the HP belt) that was shortened and extruded beneath them during the Ottawa orogeny.

    “and presumably were passively transported above a ductile lower crust (the HP belt) that was shortened and extruded beneath them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A tectonic load on the HP belt gave rise to the HP metamorphism.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Mid-Parautochthon detachment system · p. 17

    The Mid-Parautochthon shear zones in cross-sections A and C may be part of a linked detachment system, on which displacement occurred from late Ottawan to Rigolet time.

    “Connection of these shear zones between the two sections has not been established in the field, but their similar location suggests that they may be part of a linked detachment system, on which displacement occurred from late Ottawan to Rigolet time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Origin of the tectonic loads · p. 16

    In cross-sections A and C, the tectonic load on the HP belt included most of the Composite Arc belt and Frontenac terrane; in cross-sections D and E, it included the LP belt.

    “i.e., in cross-sections A and C, this would have included most of the Composite Arc belt and Frontenac terrane; and in cross-sections D and E, it would have included the LP belt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A tectonic load on the HP belt gave rise to the HP metamorphism.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evolution of cross-section E · p. 18

    Prior to the Grenvillian collision, in the vicinity of cross-section E, the Laurentian margin had Labradorian metasediments (metamorphosed c45 1660 Ma) lying outboard of granitoid rocks of the Trans-Labrador batholith (emplaced at 1650 Ma), which lay outboard of Archean basement with an undeformed Paleoproterozoic supracrustal cover.

    “The configuration of the Laurentian margin in the vicinity of cross-section E prior to the Grenvillian collision is schematically shown in Fig. 11A, with Labradorian metasediments (metamorphosed c45 1660 Ma) lying outboard of granitoid rocks comprising the Trans-Labrador batholith (emplaced at 1650 Ma), which in turn lay outboard of the Archean basement with a Paleoproterozoic supracrustal cover”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rivers 1997 source
    • cites Rivers and Corrigan 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Other normal-sense shear zones · p. 18

    Taken together, the discrete extensional structures probably represent late-orogenic to post-orogenic adjustments during the final stages of crustal thickening and ongoing denudation and uplift, and they are unlikely to be part of a linked system.

    “Taken together, these discrete extensional structures probably represent late-orogenic to post-orogenic adjustments during the final stages of crustal thickening and ongoing denudation and uplift, and they are unlikely to be part of a linked system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    Earlier pre-Grenvillian and Grenvillian orogenic activity includes offshore(?) imbrication of the components of the Composite Arc belt during the c45 1250-1220 Ma Elzevirian orogeny, and imbrication of the Composite Arc belt with the Frontenac-Adirondack belt during the c45 1190-1140 Ma Shawinigan orogeny.

    “Other earlier pre-Grenvillian and Grenvillian orogenic activity not shown in the figure includes the offshore(?) imbrication of the components of the Composite Arc belt during the c45 1250-1220 Ma Elzevirian orogeny, and imbrication of the Composite Arc belt with the FrontenacAdirondack belt during the c45 1190-1140 Ma Shawinigan orogeny (Carr et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carr et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 20

    The location of the Allochthon Boundary detachment below the HP belt is associated with bulk extension of the lower crust in the western Grenville Province, whereas it is located above or within the HP belt in the central Grenville Province.

    “(C) The location of the Allochthon Boundary detachment below the HP belt is associated with bulk extension of the lower crust in the western Grenville Province, whereas it is located above or within (not shown) the HP belt in the central Grenville Province.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 22

    The lower crust in the Parautochthonous belt was hotter and more ductile in the western Grenville Province than elsewhere.

    “We are unable to choose unambiguously among these possibilities, but in any case, we infer that the lower crust in the Parautochthonous belt was hotter and more ductile in the western Grenville Province than elsewhere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Exhumation processes · p. 23

    Unroofing of the HP belt involved southeast-directed tectonic transport in the hanging wall of late extensional faults, accompanied by tectonic erosion of hanging wall rocks, probably a minor effect.

    “southeast-directed tectonic transport in the hanging wall of late extensional faults, accompanied by tectonic erosion of hanging wall rocks (probably a minor effect)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 22

    The location of the extensional shear zone above the HP belt contributed to unroofing of the HP belt in the central Grenville Province and may partly explain the better preservation of HP assemblages there.

    “The location of the extensional shear zone above the HP belt would have contributed to unroofing of the HP belt in the central Grenville Province, and may therefore partly explain the better preservation of HP assemblages there.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation
    § One-stage and two-stage unroofing of the HP belt · p. 23

    The province-wide Ottawa orogeny was a result of continent-continent collision.

    “If the province-wide Ottawa orogeny was a result of continent-continent collision, as is commonly inferred (e.g., McLelland et al. 1996, 2001; Rivers 1997; Carr et al. 2000)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McLelland et al. 1996 source
    • cites Rivers 1997 source
    • cites Carr et al. 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 22

    In the central Grenville Province, extension took place above the HP belt and was coeval with thrust transport of the HP belt onto the footwall ramp, leading to unroofing by tectonic extrusion.

    “In contrast, in the central Grenville Province extension took place above the HP belt and was coeval with thrust transport of the HP belt onto the footwall ramp, leading to unroofing by tectonic extrusion (Hynes et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hynes et al. 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 21

    The HP belt was passively transported to the northwest.

    “HP belt passively transported to NW.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Discussion · p. 22

    The two-stage decompression path in the western Grenville Province involved initial transport into the mid-crust, imbrication with the mid-crustal Muskoka domain, and a period of granulite-facies metamorphism before final transport into the upper crust.

    “The two-stage decompression path in the western Grenville Province involved initial transport into the mid-crust, imbrication with the mid-crustal Muskoka domain, and a period of granulite-facies metamorphism before final transport into the upper crust.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Location of HP belt with respect to the Laurentian margin · p. 23

    Formation of the HP rocks in the central Grenville Province involved tectonic burial and eclogite-facies formation in rocks well inboard from the Laurentian margin, with the tectonic load in the hanging wall formed, at least in part, from the more outboard Laurentian terranes.

    “Formation of the HP rocks in the central Grenville Province, on the other hand, involved tectonic burial and eclogite-facies formation in rocks well inboard from the Laurentian margin, with the tectonic load in the hanging wall formed, at least in part, from the more outboard Laurentian terranes (Fig. 11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Exhumation processes · p. 23

    Large-scale out-of-sequence thrusting by overstacking behind the HP rocks would have resulted in reburial and reheating of previously metamorphosed rocks, prolonging unroofing and increasing the likelihood of retrogression of the HP assemblages.

    “a process that would have resulted in reburial and reheating of the previously metamorphosed rocks, thereby prolonging the unroofing process and increasing the likelihood of the retrogression of the HP assemblages”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Continuation of HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province · p. 23

    The Michael and Shabogamo gabbros are situated along strike from one another and parallel to the regional northeast trend of the northern Grenville orogen.

    “are situated along strike from one another and parallel to the regional northeast trend of the northern Grenville orogen”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § One-stage and two-stage unroofing of the HP belt · p. 23

    In the central Grenville Province, the Ottawa orogeny was associated with the maximum burial of the HP rocks and was followed by a single-stage unroofing path.

    “In the central Grenville Province, on the other hand, the Ottawa orogeny was associated with the maximum burial of the HP rocks and was followed by a single-stage unroofing path.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Exhumation processes · p. 23

    Unroofing of the HP belt involved northwest-directed transport and passive uplift in the upper crust.

    “northwest-directed transport and passive uplift in the upper crust”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Continuation of HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province · p. 23

    Eclogite-facies conditions have been calculated for the Shabogamo gabbro.

    “for which eclogite-facies conditions have been calculated (Indares and Rivers 1995)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indares and Rivers 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Exhumation processes · p. 23

    Unroofing of the HP belt involved southeast-directed transport along the extensional Allochthon Boundary detachment system, which had different effects on HP rocks depending on whether they were in the hanging wall or footwall of the detachment.

    “southeast-directed transport along the extensional Allochthon Boundary detachment system, which had different effects on the HP rocks depending upon whether they were in the hanging wall or footwall of the detachment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § One-stage and two-stage unroofing of the HP belt · p. 23

    After the Ottawa orogeny, the major pattern of subsequent tectonism appears to have been broadly similar in the western and central Grenville Province.

    “As noted, after this time, the major pattern of subsequent tectonism appears to have been broadly similar in the two areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Continuation of HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province · p. 23

    Exhumation of Grenvillian HP rocks from the point in the lower crust where the reflectors converge would be tectonically feasible, but only if the structures were Grenvillian in age.

    “Exhumation of Grenvillian HP rocks from the point in the lower crust where the reflectors converge would be tectonically feasible, but only if the structures were Grenvillian in age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Continuation of HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province · p. 23

    The Hawke River terrane may occupy a tectonic position comparable to Lac Joseph terrane in the central Grenville Province.

    “suggesting that it may occupy a tectonic position comparable to Lac Joseph terrane in the central Grenville Province”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Exhumation processes · p. 23

    The local examples of overstacking affected relatively small segments of the orogen and do not appear to have been of major consequence for unroofing of the HP rocks.

    “However, these affected relatively small segments of the orogen and do not appear to have been of major consequence for unroofing of the HP rocks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Orogen-scale constraints · p. 22

    The period of Rigolet thrusting was short-lived and was followed by ductile normal faulting by about 995 Ma, which continued sporadically into the brittle regime over the next 50 million years.

    “This period of thrusting appears to have been short-lived and was followed by ductile normal faulting by about 995 Ma, which continued sporadically into the brittle regime over the next 50 million years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Continuation of HP belt into the eastern Grenville Province · p. 23

    The seismic reflectors in the ECSOOT profile are interpreted to be largely of Labradorian age with only minor Grenvillian overprint.

    “the seismic reflectors are interpreted to be largely of Labradorian age with only minor Grenvillian overprint (Gower et al. 1997)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gower et al. 1997 source
158 of 158
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Algonquin metagabbro is 1170-1150 Ma.

    “the 1170-1150 Algonquin metagabbro”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Metamorphic zircon growth occurs during the first high P-T penetrative recrystallization event in mafic rocks.

    “the well-established pattern of metamorphic zircon growth during the first high P-T penetrative recrystallization event in mafic rocks”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A tectonic load on the HP belt gave rise to the HP metamorphism.

    “The origin of the tectonic load on the HP belt that gave rise to the HP metamorphism is a matter of some significance.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusions give a different age for western granulite-facies metamorphism

    Minor

    The conclusions date the mid-crustal granulite-facies metamorphism at 1180-1160 Ma, whereas the paper repeatedly dates that event at 1080-1060 Ma. The discrepancy changes the stated timing of a key stage in the proposed two-stage exhumation history.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Cox R., 1999, Canadian Mineralogist, 37, 335
  2. Davidson A., 2001, Nfld. Abstract, 26, A34
  3. Easton R.M., 1992, Special, 4, 715
  4. Gower C.F., 1986, Paper, 86
  5. Gower C.F., 1990, Special Paper, 38, 485
  6. Hanes J.A., 1991, Short Course Handbook, 19, 27
  7. Hynes A., 1997, Canadian Mineralogist, 35, 1173
  8. Indares A., 1997, Canadian Mineralogist, 35, 1161
  9. Ketchum J.W.F., 1997, Program with Abstracts, 22, A78
  10. Krogh T.E., 1987, Special Paper, 34, 147
  11. Scott D.J., 1994, Report, 41, 109
  12. van Breemen O., 1986, Special Paper, 31, 191

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Rivers, T., Ketchum, J., Indares, A., & Hynes, A.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
867-893
ISSN
  • 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3313
OpenAlex
W2288665748
Cited by
124
References
100
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
Grenville Province, eclogite, exhumation, unroofing, pressure-temperature estimates, thrusting, extensional faulting, Laurentian margin, Grenville orogeny, Paleoproterozoic, Mesoproterozoic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review