The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Cited by
A New Intraocular Lens Design to Reduce Spherical Aberration of Pseudophakic Eyes
Holladay, J. T., Piers, P. A., Koranyi, G., van der Mooren, M., & Norrby, N. E. S. (2002) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20021101-04 · Cited by 560
Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes
Atchison, D. A., Markwell, E. L., Kasthurirangan, S., Pope, J. M., Smith, G., & Swann, P. G. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.4.29 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubbelman, M., & Van der Heijde, G. L.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1867-1877
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021559175
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00057-8
- The paper
- Dubbelman, M., & Van der Heijde, G. L. (2001). The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00057-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
