The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Color removal from cotton textile industry wastewater in an activated sludge system with various additives
Abstract
The low biodegradability of many dyes and textile chemicals indicates that biological treatment is not always successful in the treatment of cotton textile wastewater, in terms of color removal. In this study, a specific organic flocculant (Marwichem DEC), powdered activated carbon (PAC), bentonite, activated clay and commercial synthetic inorganic clay (Macrosorb) were directly added into the activated sludge laboratory pilot plant model. Before dosage, the optimum sludge retention time and hydraulic retention time were determined as 30 days and 1.6 days, respectively. The Monod kinetic constants were determined as Y = 0.76 kg MLSS/kg COD, Kd = 0.026 l/day, K(S) = 113.3 mg/L, k = 0.42 l/day and mu(max) = 0.32 kg MLSS/kg COD day. Under these conditions the average COD removal was 94% and color removal was 36%. The addition of these materials did not change COD removal significantly. The most effective materials were found to be DEC and PAC for color removal. While the color removal efficiency for 120 mg/L DEC addition was 78%, it was 65% for 100 mg/L, 77% for 200 mg/L and 86% for 400 mg/L PAC addition. The advantage of DEC compared to PAC was the lower sludge production. Statistical analyses using multiple linear regression indicate that there is no relationship between the effluent color with the influent color and total suspended solids (TSS) for DEC and PAC addition. On the other hand, when only bentonite, activated clay and Macrosorb were added, the effluent color was pri…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Accordingly although the dye removal in that process has frequently been reported to be better than in the conventional activated sludge process 161,197 , mode of COD removal may be the same.49”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [161]
In the citing paper
“Owing to limited effectiveness of conventional biological treatment for recalcitrant textile wastewater composed of recalcitrant textile chemicals and dyes, various adsorbents and chemicals 161 , predominantly activated carbon, have been directly added into the activated sludge systems in certain studies.”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [161]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review
CRINI, G. (2006) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001 · Cited by 4,508
Malik, P. K. (2004) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.022 · Cited by 756
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Cheng, P., Chen, D., Liu, W., Cobb, K., Zhou, N., Liu, Y., Liu, H., Wang, Q., Chen, P., Zhou, C., et al. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138263 · Cited by 92
Ashour, S. S. (2010) · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2009.12.008 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Pala, A.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2920-2925
- ISSN
- 0043-1354
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review