The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of some finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convection-reaction equation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In this paper we describe several finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convection-reaction equation. None of them is new, although the presentation is non-standard in an effort to emphasize the similarities and differences between them. In particular, it is shown that the classical SUPG method is very similar to an explicit version of the Characteristic-Galerkin method, whereas the Taylor-Galerkin method has a stabilization effect similar to a sub-grid scale model, which is in turn related to the introduction of bubble functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hughes, T. J. R., Franca, L. P., & Hulbert, G. M. (1989) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/0045-7825(89)90111-4 · Cited by 1,458
Cited by
Stabilized Finite Element Methods
Franca, L. P., Hughes, T. J. R., & Stenberg, R. (1993) · Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511574856.005 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Codina, R.
- Venue
- Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 185-210
- ISSN
- 0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125529818
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of some finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convection-reaction equation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0045-7825(97)00206-5
- The paper
- Codina, R. (1998). Comparison of some finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convection-reaction equation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(97)00206-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
