Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stabilized Finite Element Methods

Open access
Franca, Leopoldo P., Hughes, Thomas J. R., Stenberg, Rolf·1993·Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics

Abstract

Introduction Physically the Stokes equations model “slow” flows of incompressible fluids or alternatively isotropic incompressible elastic materials. In Computational Fluid Dynamics, however, the Stokes equations have become an important model problem for designing and analyzing finite element algorithms. The reason being, that some of the problems encountered when solving the full Navier-Stokes equations are already present in the more simple Stokes equations. In particular, it gives the right setting for studying the stability problem connected with the choice of finite element spaces for the velocity and the pressure. It is well known that these spaces cannot be chosen independently when the discretization is based on the “Galerkin” variational form. This method belongs to the class of saddle-point problems for which an abstract theory has been developed by Brezzi [1974] and Babuska [1973]. The theory shows that the method is optimally convergent if the finite element spaces for velocity and pressure satisfy the “Babuska-Brezzi” or “inf-sup” condition. In computations the violation of this condition often leads to unphysical pressure oscillations and a “locking” of the velocity field, cf. Hughes [1987]. During the last decade this problem has been studied thoroughly and various velocity-pressure combinations have been shown to satisfy the Babuska-Brezzi condition. Unfortunately, however, it has turned out that many seemingly natural combinations do not satisfy it. (See Girault and Raviart [1986], Brezzi and Fortin [1991], and references therein.) In this chapter we will review a recent technique of “stabilizing” mixed methods. In this approach the standard Galerkin form is modified by the addition of mesh-dependent terms which are weighted residuals of the differential equations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511574856.005

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Metadata

Authors
Franca, L. P., Hughes, T. J. R., & Stenberg, R.
Venue
Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics
Published
1993-05-28
Pages
87-108
OpenAlex
W2289366489
Cited by
328
References
34
FWCI
13.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stabilized Finite Element Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511574856.005
The paper
Franca, L. P., Hughes, T. J. R., & Stenberg, R. (1993). Stabilized Finite Element Methods. Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511574856.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.