Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These issues can result in lock-in and inertia in countries and industries at any stage of development.
“These issues can result in lock-in and inertia in countries and industries at any stage of development”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as Narula, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 304
- Authors
- Narula, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Narula, Rajneesh
- ORCID
- Narula, Rajneesh
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 795-816
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083212618
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 21.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Keywords
- innovation systems, R&D location, structural inertia, exit strategy, Norwegian companies, science-based firms, traditional sector, technological discontinuity, institutional embeddedness, enterprise competitiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
