The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095325 · Cited by 4,838
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 · Cited by 2,565
Toward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Cited by
Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries
Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.90 · Cited by 576
Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2019) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdy034 · Cited by 349
Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?
Agarwal, P., & Searls, D. B. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2973 · Cited by 100
An analysis of trust among globally distributed work teams in an organizational setting
Newell, S., David, G., & Chand, D. (2007) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.284 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, F.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 1389-1403
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164417149
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
