Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Special issue on open source software development

von Krogh, Georg, von Hippel, Eric·2003·Research Policy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00054-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Austin, 2001, The effects of time pressure on quality in software development: an agency model, Information Systems Research, 12, 195, 10.1287/isre.12.2.195.9699 · DOI
  2. Cusumano, 1992, Shifting economies: from craft production to flexible systems and software factories, Research Policy, 21, 453, 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90005-O · DOI
  3. Dam, 1995, Some economic considerations in the intellectual property protection of software, Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 321, 10.1086/467962 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Granstrand, O., 1999. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar, Cheltham. · doi:10.4337/9781781008638
  5. Hertel, G., 2002. Management virtueller teams auf der basis sozialpsychologischer modelle. In: Witte, E.H. (Ed.), Sozialpsychologie Wirtschaflicher Prozesse. Pabst Publishers, Lengerich, Germany, pp. 172–202.
  6. Jargon File, 2002. The On-Line Hacker Jargon File, Version 4.3.3, 20 September 2002. http://www.tuxedo.org/∼esr/jargon/html/index.html (Raymond, E., 1996. The Jargon File is a collective on-line work by computer hackers. The New Hacker’s Dictionary, third ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
  7. Klandermans, B., 1997. The Social Psychology of Protest. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  8. Lerner, J., Tirole, J., 2000. The Simple Economics of Open Source, NBER Working Paper Series, WP 7600. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Meyer, 1995, Technology strategy in a software products company, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 194, 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00043-S · DOI
  10. Moerke, 2000, Free speech to a machine, Minnesota Law Review, 84, 1007
  11. Moody, G., 2001. Rebel Code. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
  12. Sawyer, 1998, Software development: process and performance, IBM Systems Journal, 37, 552, 10.1147/sj.374.0552 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Simon, 1996, Innovation and intellectual property protection: the software industry perspective, Columbia Journal of World Business, 31, 30, 10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90004-6 · DOI
  14. Von Hippel, E., von Krogh, G., 2003. The private-collective innovation model in open source software development. Organization Science, in press.

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1149-1157
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153815796
Cited by
230
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Special issue on open source software development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00054-4
The paper
von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Special issue on open source software development. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00054-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.