The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software
Abstract
Intellectual property has frequently had to confront the issue of how to protect new technologies. The rise of software as a major industry is one such new challenge. An economic approach to the protection of software adds to the already extensive legal analysis. On the one hand, existing copyright and patent law provides a sound basis for an economically efficient system of protection. Copyright law deals with the appropriability problem without creating significant monopoly or rent-seeking problems. Copyright law also provides a sound basis for preserving a balance between innovation today and innovation tomorrow. These conclusions depend crucially, however, on maintaining the distinctions between attachment and replacement and between transformative and substitutive uses. Software-related patents are economically sound. However, as actually administered, the system may generate too many invalid patents. Sui generis protection is less desirable than copyright and patent protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy
Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.2.133 · Cited by 1,064
What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)
Posner, R. A. (1993) · Supreme Court Economic Review · doi:10.1086/scer.3.1147064 · Cited by 839
Introduction to regression analysis
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3472 · Cited by 414
Sequential versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis
Landes, W. M. (1993) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/468159 · Cited by 352
The Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law
Dam, K. W. (1994) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/467923 · Cited by 328
Self-citationExplicit Reasons for Implicit Contracts: The Legal Logic to the Japanese Main Bank System
Ramseyer, J. M. (1995) · The Japanese Main Bank System · doi:10.1093/0198288999.003.0007 · Cited by 322
Bankruptcy Rules, Managerial Entrenchment, and Firm-Specific Human Capital
Picker, R. C., & Bebchuk, L. A. (1993) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 319
The welfare economics of immigration law: a theoretical survey with an analysis of U.S. policy
Sykes, A. O. (1995) · Justice in Immigration · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663789.008 · Cited by 305
Copyright Protection of Letters, Diaries, and Other Unpublished Works: An Economic Approach
Landes, W. M. (1992) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/467901 · Cited by 302
The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs
Breyer, S. (1970) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1339714 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances
Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<295::aid-smj91>3.0.co;2-o · Cited by 1,625
Sunstein, C. R. (1999) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.199668 · Cited by 384
Judicial Influence: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges
Landes, W. M., Lessig, L., & Solimine, M. E. (1998) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/468022 · Cited by 373
Does a helping hand put others at risk?: affirmative action, police departments, and crime
Lott, J. (2000) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1093/ei/38.2.239 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Dam, K. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Legal Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 321-377
- ISSN
- 0047-2530 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5366
- OpenAlex
- W2015115039
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 158.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/467962
- The paper
- Dam, K. W. (1995). Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software. The Journal of Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1086/467962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.