Daily intake of essential minerals and metallic micropollutants from foods in France
Abstract
Daily intakes of essential minerals and metallic micro-pollutants are estimated from foods usually eaten in France. These foods are grouped in nine categories. For essential elements, intake estimates are comparable to the values recommended by the WHO. The cadmium value is lower than the tolerable daily dose. The estimated values are: cobalt 29 micrograms/day, chromium 98 microgram/day, copper 1.5 mg/day, manganese 2.5 mg/day, molybdenum 275 micrograms/day, zinc 14 microgram/day, aluminium 4.2 mg/day, boron 1.6 mg/day, cadmium 27 micrograms/day and nickel 231 microgram/day.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Daily intakes of aluminium in humans from food range from 3.4 to 9 mg/day.
“Daily intakes of Al in humans from food range from 3.4 to 9 mg/day (Pennington and Schoen, 1995; Biego et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2014).”
From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Biego et al., 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human Health Risk Assessment for Aluminium, Aluminium Oxide, and Aluminium Hydroxide
Krewski, D., Yokel, R. A., Nieboer, E., Borchelt, D., Cohen, J., Harry, J., Kacew, S., Lindsay, J., Mahfouz, A. M., & Rondeau, V. (2007) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400701597766 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects
Igbokwe, I. O., Igwenagu, E., & Igbokwe, N. A. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2019-0007 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
“Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 24.02.20 14:34 UTC ISSN: 1337-6853 (print version) | 1337-9569 (electronic version) Daily intakes of Al in humans from food range from 3.4 to 9 mg/day (Pennington and Schoen, 1995; Biego et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- BIEGO, G., JOYEUX, M., HARTEMANN, P., & DEBRY, G.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- BIEGO, G
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-06-11
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 27-36
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091454748
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
- Keywords
- dietary intake, essential minerals, trace elements, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, aluminum, boron, nickel, tolerable daily intake, France
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Food Contamination, France, Humans, Minerals, Metals, Heavy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review