Cited by 162Fluid Dynamics and MixingMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

The scale−up of microbial batch and fed−batch fermentation processes

Open access
Hewitt, Christopher J., Nienow, Alvin W.·2007·Advances in Applied Microbiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2164(07)62005-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers would expect a higher yield of end-products from fed-batch fermentation because it entails a scale-up process.

    “Given that the fed-batch fermentation system entails a scale-up process, researchers would expect a higher yield of end-products (Modak et al., 1986; Thiry and Cingolani, 2002; Hewitt and Nienow, 2007).”

    From Fermentation Conditions that Affect Clavulanic Acid Production in Streptomyces clavuligerus: A Systematic Review (2016) · cites this paper as Hewitt and Nienow, 2007

    The Introduction says that biomass yield and growth-associated products often decrease when aerobic fermentation is scaled up. Although ‘Operational Constraints at the large-scale’ describes fed-batch cultivation as a way to increase volumetric productivity, it does not attribute that increase to scale-up; the claimed reason for expecting a higher yield is contrary to the paper's account. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sometimes a large-scale fed-batch fermentation may not generate similar results as observed in small-scale batch fermentation, because the fed-batch fermentation system involves a more dynamic environment.

    “However, it has been suggested that sometimes a large-scale fed-batch fermentation may not generate similar results as observed in small-scale batch fermentation, as the fed-batch fermentation system involves a more dynamic environment (Hewitt and Nienow, 2007).”

    From Fermentation Conditions that Affect Clavulanic Acid Production in Streptomyces clavuligerus: A Systematic Review (2016) · cites this paper as Hewitt and Nienow, 2007

    The Conclusions and Future Perspective section says large-scale fed-batch bioreactors have dynamic spatial and temporal heterogeneities that can reduce biomass and product yields relative to well-mixed laboratory reactors. However, the Experimental Results section compares large-scale fed-batch fermentation with small-scale fed-batch fermentation, not the small-scale batch fermentation specified in the claim. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Amanullah, A., Nienow, A. W. and Buckland, B. C. (2003). Mixing in the fermentation and cell culture industries. In 'Handbook of Industrial Mixing; Science and Practice' (E.L. Paul, V.A. Atiemo-Obeng and S.M. Kresta, Eds.), pp 1071-1157. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  2. Einsele, A. (1978). Scaling-up of bioreactors. Proc. Biochem. 13, 13-14.
  3. Enfors, S. O. (2004). Preface. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology -Physiological Stress Responses in Bioprocesses, (S. O. Enfors, Ed.), Vol. 89, pp ix -x. Springer, New York.
  4. Hewitt, C. J, Onyeaka, H., Lewis, G.,. Taylor I W and Nienow, A. W. (2007). A comparison of high cell density fed-batch fermentations involving both induced and non-induced recombinant Escherichia coli under well-mixed small-scale and simulated poorly-mixed large-scale conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (In press).
  5. Hoffman, F. and Rinas, U. (2004). Stress induced by recombinant protein production in E. coli. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology - Physiological Stress Responses in Bioprocesses, (S. O. Enfors, Ed.), Vol. 89, pp 73 -92. Springer, New York.
  6. Kresta, S. M. and Brodkey, R. S. (2003). Turbulence in mixing applications. In 'Handbook of Industrial Mixing; Science and Practice'. (E. L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng and S. M. Kresta, Eds.), pp 19-87. Wiley-Interscience, NewYork.
  7. Middleton, J. C. and Smith, J. M. (2003). Gas-liquid mixing in turbulent systems. In 'Handbook of Industrial Mixing; Science and Practice'. (E. L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng and S. M. Kresta, Eds.), pp 585 -635. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  8. Nienow, A. W. (1998). Hydrodynamics of stirred bioreactors. In 'Fluid mechanics problems in biotechnology'. (R. Pohorecki, Ed.) App. Mech. Rev. 51, 3-32.
  9. Nienow, A. W. (2003). Aeration-Biotechnology. In 'Kirk Othmer Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology, 5th Edition' (on-line), Wiley, New York.
  10. Nienow, A.W. (2005). Considerations of mixing at the pilot plant stage in bioreactors, Inz. Chem. I. Proc. 26, 395 -403.
  11. Schütze, J. and Hengstler, J. (2006). Assessing aerated bioreactor performance using CFD, Proc. 12th European Conference on Mixing, Bologna, June 2006; AIDIC, Milan, Italy, 439 -436.
  12. Schweder, T. and Hecker M. (2004). Monitoring of stress responses. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology -Physiological Stress Responses in Bioprocesses, (S. O. Enfors, Ed.), Vol. 89, pp 47 -72. Springer, New York.
  13. Simmons M. J. H , Zhu, H., Bujalski, W., Hewitt, C. J. and Nienow, A.W. (2007). Mixing in bioreactors using agitators with a high solidity ratio and deep blades T. I. Chem Eng-Lond. A. (In press).
  14. Thomas, C. R., (1990) Problems of shear in biotechnology. In "Chemical Engineering Problems in Biotechnology", (M.A. Winkler, Ed.), pp 23 -94. Elsevier Applied Science, United Kingdom.
  15. Wick, L. M. and Egli, T. (2004). Molecular components of physiological stress responses in E. coli. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology - Physiological Stress Responses in Bioprocesses, (S. O. Enfors, Ed.), Vol. 89, pp 1 -46. Springer, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hewitt, C. J., & Nienow, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Advances in Applied Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2007
Volume
62
Pages
105-135
ISSN
0065-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768258932
Cited by
162
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
32.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Advances in applied microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
scale-up, fed-batch fermentation, batch fermentation, microbial fermentation, spatiotemporal heterogeneity, physiological responses, shear damage, biomass concentration, product yield, feeding regime, bioreactor design
MeSH terms
Engineering, Fermentation, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review