Cited by 190Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Chapter 1 Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions

Fenske, Mark J., Aminoff, Elissa, Gronau, Nurit, Bar, Moshe·2006·Progress in brain research

Abstract

The neural mechanisms subserving visual recognition are traditionally described in terms of bottom-up analysis, whereby increasingly complex aspects of the visual input are processed along a hierarchical progression of cortical regions. However, the importance of top-down facilitation in successful recognition has been emphasized in recent models and research findings. Here we consider evidence for top-down facilitation of recognition that is triggered by early information about an object, as well as by contextual associations between an object and other objects with which it typically appears. The object-based mechanism is proposed to trigger top-down facilitation of visual recognition rapidly, using a partially analyzed version of the input image (i.e., a blurred image) that is projected from early visual areas directly to the prefrontal cortex (PFC). This coarse representation activates in the PFC information that is back-projected as "initial guesses" to the temporal cortex where it presensitizes the most likely interpretations of the input object. In addition to this object-based facilitation, a context-based mechanism is proposed to trigger top-down facilitation through contextual associations between objects in scenes. These contextual associations activate predictive information about which objects are likely to appear together, and can influence the "initial guesses" about an object's identity. We have shown that contextual associations are analyzed by a network that includes the parahippocampal cortex and the retrosplenial complex. The integrated proposal described here is that object- and context-based top-down influences operate together, promoting efficient recognition by framing early information about an object within the constraints provided by a lifetime of experience with contextual associations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)55001-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The M system is involved in processing of overall stimulus organization.

    “The M system is driven by neurons in the LGN with large cell bodies and, in general, conducts low-resolution visual information rapidly to cortex and is involved in initial attentional capture (typically by stimulus onset/offset and/or movement) and processing of overall stimulus organization (2–5).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [4]

  • The M system is involved in initial attentional capture.

    “The M system is driven by neurons in the LGN with large cell bodies and, in general, conducts low-resolution visual information rapidly to cortex and is involved in initial attentional capture (typically by stimulus onset/offset and/or movement) and processing of overall stimulus organization (2–5).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [4]

  • The M system conducts low-resolution visual information rapidly to cortex.

    “The M system is driven by neurons in the LGN with large cell bodies and, in general, conducts low-resolution visual information rapidly to cortex and is involved in initial attentional capture (typically by stimulus onset/offset and/or movement) and processing of overall stimulus organization (2–5).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [4]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 190

Authors
Fenske, M. J., Aminoff, E., Gronau, N., & Bar, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bar, Moshe
Venue
Progress in brain research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Volume
155
Pages
3-21
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1599026601
Cited by
190
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
12.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS44319, R01NS044319, R01NS050615)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, P41RR014075)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
visual object recognition, prefrontal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, retrosplenial complex, initial guess, predictive processing, contextual associations, scene perception, bottom-up processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review