The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unconventional methods in cellulose functionalization
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material
Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H., & Bohn, A. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200460587 · Cited by 7,551
Ionic liquids and catalysis: Recent progress from knowledge to applications
Olivier-Bourbigou, H., Magna, L., & Morvan, D. (2010) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.10.008 · Cited by 1,639
Ionic Liquids and Their Interaction with Cellulose
Pinkert, A., Marsh, K. N., Pang, S., & Staiger, M. P. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001947 · Cited by 1,508
Ionic liquid processing of cellulose
Wang, H., Gurau, G., & Rogers, R. D. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15311d · Cited by 1,369
Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids and its application: a mini-review
Zhu, S., Wu, Y., Chen, Q., Yu, Z., Wang, C., Jin, S., Ding, Y., & Wu, G. (2006) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b601395c · Cited by 1,260
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinze, T., & Liebert, T.
- Venue
- Progress in Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1689-1762
- ISSN
- 0079-6700 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049780307
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unconventional methods in cellulose functionalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00022-3
- The paper
- Heinze, T., & Liebert, T. (2001). Unconventional methods in cellulose functionalization. Progress in Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00022-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
