Cited by 23Amino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPolyamine Metabolism and Applications

Renal N-oxidation of trimethylamine in the chicken during tubular excretion.

Acara, M, Camiolo, S, Rennick, B·1977·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

The Sperber technique of infusion into the renal portal circulation in chickens was used to investigate in vivo the renal tubular transport and renal metabolism of trimethylamine (TMA). When 14C-TMA was infused at a rate of 1 x 10(-9) mol/min the transport efficiency (TE), that is, the tubular excretion of the 14C-label relative to excretion of simultaneously infused paminohippuric acid, was 0.70. Progressive addition of unlabeled TMA up to infusion rates of 1 x 10(-5) mol/min produced a progressive fall in the TE of the 14C-label. Identification of the 14C-label excreted in the urine revealed that approximately 85% of the infused 14C-TMA was excreted by the infused kidney as a single metabolite over the entire range of infusions. By use of the techniques of low-voltage electrophoresis, high-voltage electrophoretic mobility-pH profile, and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, the renal metabolite was found to be identical with standard 14C-trimethylamine oxide (TMAO). At a TMA infusion rate of 1.5 x 10(-6) mol/kg/min reaching the infused kidney, the rate at which TMAO was formed and excreted by the kidney was 0.12 x 10(-6) mol per g of kidney per min. When 14C-TMAO was infused into chickens its TE was 0.11, which was not evidence for active excretory transport. Infused TMA was almost entirely metabolized in vivo to its N-oxide, TMAO, which then entered the urine. The renal tubular excretion of 14C during infusion of 14C-TMA was inhibited by the cationic blocker of transport, quinine, and by the anionic blocker of transport, probenecid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0090-9556(25)05909-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A substantial proportion (40-50%) of individuals with heart failure also demonstrate some extent of kidney dysfunction.

    “Importantly, a substantial proportion (40–50%) of individuals with heart failure also demonstrate some extent of kidney dysfunction189,190.”

    From Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure (2019) · cites this paper as [189]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acara, M., Camiolo, S., & Rennick, B.
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
82-90
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1750597971
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
trimethylamine, trimethylamine N-oxide, renal tubular excretion, renal metabolism, N-oxidation, chicken kidney, transport efficiency, quinine, probenecid
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Active, Chickens, Chromatography, Gas, Electrophoresis, Paper, Female, Kidney, Kidney Tubules, Methylamines, Oxidation-Reduction, Probenecid, Quinine, Mass Spectrometry, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review