The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Species similarities and differences in pharmacokinetics.
Abstract
One of the fundamental challenges drug metabolism scientists face in drug discovery and development is the extrapolation of metabolic data and risk assessment from animals to humans. Although it is generally believed that data from animal studies can be reasonably extrapolated to humans with the application of appropriate pharmacokinetic principles, there are certainly some limitations. The purpose of this review is to show some species similarities and differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, with an attempt to address the questions of whether animal data can be extrapolated and what the limitations are. The underlying mechanisms responsible for these similarities and differences are discussed and examples given for illustration. In addition, the concepts of allometric and physiological models for extrapolation of kinetic data are briefly highlighted. In conclusion, although pharmacokinetics has been advanced greatly in recent years, it is not yet possible to predict all of the pharmacokinetic parameters of a drug in humans from animal studies. Nevertheless, under certain well-defined conditions, it may be possible to make reasonably good predictions. For example, the intrinsic absorption of a given drug across the wall of the gastrointestinal tract is probably similar among species, because the nature of the biomembrane of epithelial cells is similar in mammals and because the absorption process is basically an interaction between the drug and the biomembrane. However, other factors, such as pH-dependent solubility and first-pass metabolism that affect the absorption, may differ from species to species resulting in species differences in absorption. Predicting the renal excretion of drugs in humans has been relatively successful using the glomerular filtration rate ratio between humans and animals. Similarity, if the elimination of a drug is mainly by the liver and the rate of elimination is limited by hepatic blood flow, one could predict the clearance of the drug in humans by the hepatic blood flow. However, biochemical parameters, such as protein binding and drug metabolism, are less predictable. These parameters vary considerably among species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Martignoni, M., Groothuis, G. M. M., & de Kanter, R. (2006) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425255.2.6.875 · Cited by 1,478
The Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetic Parameters from Preclinical and in Vitro Metabolism Data
Obach, R. S., Baxter, J. G., Liston, T. E., Silber, B. M., Jones, B. C., Macintyre, F., Rance, D. J., & Wastall, P. (1997) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)36999-x · Cited by 987
Prediction of in vivo drug metabolism in the human liver from in vitro metabolism data
Iwatsubo, T., Hirota, N., Ooie, T., Suzuki, H., Shimada, N., Chiba, K., Ishizaki, T., Green, C. E., Tyson, C. A., & Sugiyama, Y. (1997) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(96)00184-2 · Cited by 479
Organ/body-on-a-chip based on microfluidic technology for drug discovery
Kimura, H., Sakai, Y., & Fujii, T. (2018) · Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1016/j.dmpk.2017.11.003 · Cited by 435
The gut microbiome in Alzheimer’s disease: what we know and what remains to be explored
Chandra, S., Sisodia, S. S., & Vassar, R. J. (2023) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00595-7 · Cited by 278
Systematic reviews of animal models: methodology versus epistemology
Greek, R., & Menache, A. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijms.5529 · Cited by 207
Chiou, W. L., Jeong, H. Y., Chung, S. M., & Wu, T. C. (2000) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1007552927404 · Cited by 182
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 176
Silva, M. C., Nandi, G. A., Tentarelli, S., Gurrell, I. K., Jamier, T., Lucente, D., Dickerson, B. C., Brown, D. G., Brandon, N. J., & Haggarty, S. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16984-1 · Cited by 157
Lav??, T., Coassolo, P., & Reigner, B. (1999) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-199936030-00003 · Cited by 162
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic simulation modelling
Grass, G. M., & Sinko, P. J. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00013-3 · Cited by 160
Bumbaca Yadav, D., Sharma, V. K., Boswell, C. A., Hotzel, I., Tesar, D., Shang, Y., Ying, Y., Fischer, S. K., Grogan, J. L., Chiang, E. Y., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.692434 · Cited by 82
The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling
Greek, R., Pippus, A., & Hansen, L. A. (2012) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-13-16 · Cited by 78
Ferl, G. Z., Theil, F., & Wong, H. (2016) · Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition · doi:10.1002/bdd.1994 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J. H.
- Venue
- Drug Metabolism and Disposition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1008-1021
- ISSN
- 0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1899693663
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.