The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cocaine disposition in humans after intravenous injection, nasal insufflation (snorting), or smoking.
Abstract
The disposition of radiolabeled cocaine in humans has been studied after three routes of administration: iv injection, nasal insufflation (ni, snorting), and smoke inhalation (si). Metabolism, followed by urinary excretion of metabolites, proved to be the major route of elimination in all cases. Hydrolytic products (benzoylecgonine, ecgonine methyl ester) were the major excretion products. Benzoyl ecgonine was generally most prevalent, but after smoking two subjects excreted larger amounts of ecgonine methyl ester and the ratio of the two compounds averaged lower in subjects who smoked cocaine. Low binding of cocaine to plasma proteins was observed and blood to plasma ratios were essentially unity. The volume of distribution of cocaine is low (2.70 liter/kg for V beta). Absorption of smoked cocaine was rapid (half-time of 1.1 min). Absorption after ni was slower (half-time of 11.7 min). After iv injection, a rapid distribution phase was observed (half-life of 11 min) and the elimination half-life was 78 min. In 16 subjects divided into three groups based on routes, the half-life based on the average rate constant was 69 min. Bioavailability was good after ni (80%). Undecomposed cocaine from si was well absorbed, but observed bioavailability was diminished by degradation from heating.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
REDFERN, W., CARLSSON, L., DAVIS, A., LYNCH, W., MACKENZIE, I., PALETHORPE, S., SIEGL, P., STRANG, I., SULLIVAN, A., & WALLIS, R. (2003) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00846-5 · Cited by 1,532
Cardiovascular complications of cocaine use
Lange, R. A., & Hillis, L. D. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200108023450507 · Cited by 810
Volkow, N. D. (1995) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950180042006 · Cited by 575
Preanalytic aspects in postmortem toxicology
Skopp, G. (2004) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.02.012 · Cited by 292
Crack Cocaine and Cocaine Hydrochloride: Are the Differences Myth or Reality?
Hatsukami, D. K. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540190052029 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeffcoat, A. R., Perez-Reyes, M., Hill, J. M., Sadler, B. M., & Cook, C. E.
- Venue
- Drug Metabolism and Disposition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-159
- ISSN
- 0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2341903610
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cocaine disposition in humans after intravenous injection, nasal insufflation (snorting), or smoking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0090-9556(25)08737-9
- The paper
- Jeffcoat, A. R., Perez-Reyes, M., Hill, J. M., Sadler, B. M., & Cook, C. E. (1989). Cocaine disposition in humans after intravenous injection, nasal insufflation (snorting), or smoking. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-9556(25)08737-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.