Cited by 139Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsNF-κB Signaling PathwaysImmune Response and Inflammation

Specific ablation of Stat3β distorts the pattern of Stat3-responsive gene expression and impairs recovery from endotoxic shock

Open access
Yoo, Joo-Yeon, Huso, David L., Nathans, Daniel, Desiderio, Stephen·2002·Cell

Abstract

Alternative splicing of the gene for Stat3, a transcription factor activated by the IL-6 family of cytokines, produces two isoforms: Stat3alpha and a dominant-negative variant, Stat3beta. Stat3beta-deficient mice were generated by gene targeting. Despite intact expression and phosphorylation of Stat3alpha, overall Stat3 activity was impaired in Stat3beta(-/-) cells. Global comparison of transcription in Stat3beta(+/+) and Stat3beta(-/-) cells revealed stable differences. Stat3beta-deficient mice exhibit diminished recovery from endotoxic shock and hyperresponsiveness of a subset of endotoxin-inducible genes in liver. The hepatic response to endotoxin in wild-type mice is accompanied by a transient increase in the ratio of Stat3beta to Stat3alpha. These findings indicate a critical role for Stat3beta in the control of systemic inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00636-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct side-by-side comparisons of STAT3α phosphorylation in Stat3β−/−, Stat3β+/− or Stat3β+/+ cells were not presented in those studies, and the loss of STAT3 DNA binding or STAT3 reporter gene activity appeared to be greater than could be anticipated based solely on the ratios of STAT3α/STAT3β in WT cells.

    “However, direct side-by-side comparisons of STAT3α phosphorylation in Stat3β−/−, Stat3β+/− or Stat3β+/+ cells were not presented in those studies and the loss of STAT3 DNA binding or STAT3 reporter gene activity appeared to be greater than could be anticipated based solely on the ratios of STAT3α/STAT3β in WT cells [16].”

    From Selective STAT3-α or -β expression reveals spliceform-specific phosphorylation kinetics, nuclear retention and distinct gene expression outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vivo studies indicate a requirement for STAT3β during endotoxic assault, a requirement for STAT3α in IL-8 synthesis, and differential roles for STAT3α and STAT3β in anti-inflammatory responses.

    “spliceform-specific functions have been indicated by various in vivo studies showing a requirement for STAT3β during endotoxic assault [16], but a requirement for STAT3α in IL-8 synthesis [17], as well as differential roles for STAT3α and STAT3β in anti-inflammatory responses [15].”
  • Others have concluded that there were no noticeable changes in STAT3α regulation in the absence of STAT3β (i.e. in Stat3β−/− MEFs) following cytokine stimulation.

    “Indeed, others have also concluded that there were no noticeable changes in STAT3α regulation in the absence of STAT3β (i.e. in Stat3β−/− MEFs) following cytokine stimulation [16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Akira, S. ∙ Nishio, Y. ∙ Inoue, M. ... Molecular cloning of APRF, a novel IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 p91-related transcription factor involved in the gp130-mediated signaling pathway Cell. 1994; 77:63-71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoo, J.-Y., Huso, D. L., Nathans, D., & Desiderio, S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Desiderio, Stephen
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
331-344
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032260589
Cited by
139
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
STAT3β, alternative splicing, dominant-negative isoform, endotoxic shock, endotoxin, systemic inflammation, hepatic gene expression, liver, IL-6 family cytokines, transcriptional regulation, gene targeting
MeSH terms
Acute-Phase Proteins, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endotoxins, Liver, Molecular Sequence Data, Shock, Septic, Transcriptional Activation, Trans-Activators, Alternative Splicing, Mice, Knockout, Protein Isoforms, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review