Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 588

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY

Open access
Pound, Charles R., Partin, Alan W., Epstein, Jonathan I., Walsh, Patrick C.·1997·Urologic Clinics of North America

Abstract

In a series of 1623 men with a follow-up of 5 +/- 3 years (range 1-13) after anatomic RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer, 17% (276/1623) have shown recurrence. A detectable PSA was the only evidence of recurrence in 7.9%, whereas 2.5% have recurred locally and 5.4% have developed distant metastases. The overall actuarial progression-free rate for these men at 10 years was 68%. Actuarial rates at 10 years were 18% for development of an isolated PSA recurrence, 8% for local recurrence, and 9% for distant recurrence. The actuarial likelihood of a postoperative recurrence increased with increasing clinical stage, Gleason score, preoperative PSA level, and pathologic stage. Although not shown in our previous report, the actuarial rate of recurrence of tumors with a Gleason score of 7 was statistically different from that of tumors of higher Gleason score (8-10). As well, men with preoperative PSA levels of 10.1 to 20 ng/mL experienced recurrence at a significantly lower rate than did men with preoperative PSA levels greater than 20 ng/mL. By using a combination of Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status, we demonstrated that the presence of a positive surgical margin did not dramatically affect recurrence in tumors of Gleason scores 2 to 6 with capsular penetration. Surgical margin status was important in high-grade tumors with capsular penetration. In fact, tumors with capsular penetration, Gleason score of at least 7, and a positive surgical margin behaved similarly to tumors with invasion of the seminal vesicles. Preservation of potency did not adversely influence cancer control. The Gleason score, presence or absence of seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement, and the timing of PSA recurrence are all important variables in predicting eventual local versus distant failure associated with an isolated rise in serum PSA. Overall actuarial cause-specific survival at 5 and 10 years was 99% and 93%. Although there was no difference in survival among men grouped by TNM stage or preoperative PSA, advancing histologic grade and pathologic stage did have an effect on actuarial cause-specific survival. Men undergoing RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer showed a 16% actuarial rate of development of metastatic disease at 10 years. This is considerably better than conservative therapy and justifies RRP as the treatment of choice for men with clinically localized disease who are otherwise healthy and have a greater than 10-year life expectancy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70386-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 588

Metadata

Authors
Pound, C. R., Partin, A. W., Epstein, J. I., & Walsh, P. C.
Venue
Urologic Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-05
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
395-406
ISSN
0094-0143 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967770117
Cited by
588
References
0
FWCI
41.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70386-4
The paper
Pound, C. R., Partin, A. W., Epstein, J. I., & Walsh, P. C. (1997). PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY. Urologic Clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70386-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.