The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological Evaluation After 1,000 Cases at Montsouris Institute
Abstract
PURPOSE: We performed a prospective oncological evaluation of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in regard to local tumor control and biochemical recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and March 2002, 1,000 consecutive patients with a mean age +/- SD of 63 +/- 6.2 years and clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at 1 institution. Preoperative 1997 TNM clinical stage was T1a in 6 patients (0.6%), T1b in 3 (0.3%), T1c in 660 (66.5%), T2a in 304 (30.4%) and T2b in 27 (2.7%). Mean preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) +/- SD was 10 +/- 6.1 ng./ml. (range 1.5 to 55). Postoperatively, surgical specimens were assessed and positive surgical margins recorded. Factors that could influence the surgical margins status were evaluated. Irrespective of pathological stage or surgical margin status, no adjuvant treatment was proposed before an increasing PSA. PSA recurrence was defined as PSA greater than 0.1 ng./ml. and was confirmed by a second increase. Recurrence time was defined as the time of the first increase in PSA. RESULTS: Postoperative pathological stage was pT2aN0/Nx in 203 patients (20.3%), pT2bN0/Nx in 572 (57.2%), pT3aN0/Nx in 142 (14.2%), pT3bN0/Nx in 77 (7.7%) and pT1-3 N1 in 6 (0.6%). Positive surgical margin rate was 6.9%, 18.6%, 30% and 34% for pathological stages pT2a, pT2b, pT3a and pT3b, respectively (p <0.001). The main predictors of a positive surgical margin were preoperative PSA (p <0.001), clinical stage (p = 0.001), pathological stage (p <0.001) and Gleason score (p = 0.003). The overall actuarial biochemical progression-free survival rate was 90.5% at 3 years. According to the pathological stage, the progression-free survival rate was 91.8% for pT2aN0/Nx, 88% for pT2bN0/Nx, 77% for pT3aN0/Nx, 44% for pT3bN0/Nx and 50% for pT1-3N1 (p <0.001). Of the patients 94% with negative surgical margins and 80% with positive margins had progression-free survival (p <0.001). Preservation of the neurovascular bundles in patients with localized tumors had no significant effect on the subsequent risk of positive surgical margins or progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Based on followup, our evaluation confirms that laparoscopic radical prostatectomy provides satisfactory results in regard to local tumor control and biochemical recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors
Carter, D. (1998) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199810000-00016 · Cited by 6,330
Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight into Etiology and Prevention
Walsh, P. C., & Donker, P. J. (2017) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.105 · Cited by 1,463
Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight Into Etiology and Prevention
Walsh, P. C., & Donker, P. J. (1982) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53012-8 · Cited by 1,439
CANCER CONTROL WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ALONE IN 1,000 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS
HULL, G. W., RABBANI, F., ABBAS, F., WHEELER, T. M., KATTAN, M. W., & SCARDINO, P. T. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)69079-7 · Cited by 964
LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS TECHNIQUE
GUILLONNEAU, B., & VALLANCIEN, G. (2000) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67512-x · Cited by 668
Self-citationPROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
Pound, C. R., Partin, A. W., Epstein, J. I., & Walsh, P. C. (1997) · Urologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70386-4 · Cited by 588
Prognostic Significance of Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
Ohori, M., Wheeler, T. M., Kattan, M. W., Goto, Y., & Scardino, P. T. (1995) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66792-2 · Cited by 559
SERUM PSA AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
Partin, A. W., Pound, C. R., Clemens, J. Q., Epstein, J. I., & Walsh, P. C. (1993) · Urologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0094-0143(21)00924-1 · Cited by 460
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors.5th ed
Szucs, R. (1998) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.207.1.66 · Cited by 448
LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
TRABULSI, E. J., & GUILLONNEAU, B. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000154970.63147.90 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Cited by
Bianco, F. J., Scardino, P. T., & Eastham, J. A. (2005) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.116 · Cited by 553
LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
TRABULSI, E. J., & GUILLONNEAU, B. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000154970.63147.90 · Cited by 393
Self-citationMen's experiences following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A qualitative descriptive study
Milne, J. L., Spiers, J. A., & Moore, K. N. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.006 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- GUILLONNEAU, B., EL-FETTOUH, H., BAUMERT, H., CATHELINEAU, X., DOUBLET, J. D., FROMONT, G., & VALLANCIEN, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1261-1266
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2030329687
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 48.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological Evaluation After 1,000 Cases at Montsouris Institute. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000055141.36916.be
- The paper
- GUILLONNEAU, B., EL-FETTOUH, H., BAUMERT, H., CATHELINEAU, X., DOUBLET, J. D., FROMONT, G., & VALLANCIEN, G. (2003). Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological Evaluation After 1,000 Cases at Montsouris Institute. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000055141.36916.be
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.