CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rhinoplasty with Advancing Age

Rohrich, Rod J., Hollier, Larry H.·1996·Clinics in Plastic Surgery
DOI 10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31118-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aging nose presents several unique challenges to diagnosis and management. Although classically it presents as a drooping nasal tip secondary to loss of tip support with a relative dorsal hump, there are associated changes in the nasal skin, bony architecture, and airway that mandate consideration. Methods of correction emphasize restoration of tip support with nondestructive suture techniques. Use of osteotomies is minimized. Airway patency is improved or maintained by restoring the internal nasal valve, often with dorsal spreader grafts. Finally, special consideration is given to the patients' unique expectations and motivation. Rhinoplasty in the patient with advancing age is a rewarding operative procedure if one follows the guidelines delineated here to optimize the functional and aesthetic results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31118-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors like septal deviation, aging, facial nerve paralysis or paresis, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis may contribute and worsen nasal valve insufficiency.

    “Factors like septal deviation, aging, facial nerve paralysis or paresis, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis may contribute and worsen nasal valve insufficiency [6, 7].”

    From The value of spreader grafts in rhinoplasty: a critical review (2012) · cites this paper as [6]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rohrich RJ: The aging nose—Management principles. Presented at the Aesthetic Surgery Symposium, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, 1991
  2. Rohrich, 1995, Dorsal reduction and osteotomies, Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium, 12, 209
  3. Rohrich, 1995, Harvesting cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty, Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium, 12, 301

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rohrich, R. J., & Hollier, L. H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Hollier, Larry H.
Venue
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
281-296
ISSN
0094-1298 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31118-4
OpenAlex
W1572520803
Cited by
25
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Clinics in Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
rhinoplasty, nasal tip support, internal nasal valve, nasal patency, patient expectations
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Bone, Nasal Cavity, Nose, Rhinoplasty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review