Cited by 473Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionCategorization, perception, and language

Tone perception in Far Eastern languages

Open access
Gandour, Jack·1983·Journal of Phonetics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30813-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gandour, J.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Gandour, Jack
Venue
Journal of Phonetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
149-175
ISSN
0095-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4019956
Cited by
473
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Phonetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
tone perception, tonal languages, Mandarin Chinese, Cantonese, Taiwanese, Thai, English speakers, perceptual dimensions, language experience, phonological structure, cross-linguistic perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review