Cited by 180Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCategorization, perception, and language

Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning

Guion, Susan G., Pederson, Eric·2007·Language Learning & Language Teaching

Abstract

Flege’s Speech Learning Model posits that adult second language learners retain the abilities of child learners for the perception and formation of novel phonetic categories. For novel categories to be formed, learners must discern at least some of the phonetic differences between the novel L2 and the closest L1 sound. However the model does not fully specify the mechanisms by which learners may come to discern relevant phonetic differences. This paper presents two studies investigating learners’ abilities to attend to novel perceptual dimensions and the effect of attention on discerning phonetic differences. In one study, English, Mandarin, Japanese, and advanced late-learners of Mandarin gave similarity judgments of synthesized tones. Mandarin listeners judged on the basis of both average F0 and F0 slope. English and Japanese listeners did not use slope, whereas advanced Mandarin learners did. This suggests that late-learners can learn to attend to novel perceptual dimensions. In the other study, English monolinguals were grouped into those instructed to attend to Hindi phonetic contrasts and those instructed to attend to sound-meaning correspondences of the same stimuli. For the novel [???-??] contrast, the sound-attending group showed better discrimination post-training. This suggests that with explicit directing of attention, adult learners can better discern novel phonetic contrasts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/lllt.17.09gui

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent data suggest attention plays a role in adult second-language phonetic learning.

    “Recent data suggest a role for attention in adult second-language phonetic learning as well (Guion and Pederson, 2007).”

    From Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition (2010) · cites this paper as Guion and Pederson, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E.
Venue
Language Learning & Language Teaching
Published
2007-01-17
Pages
57-77
ISSN
1569-9471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2477012804
Cited by
180
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.57
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language learning and language teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
attention, phonetic learning, second language phonology, Mandarin tones, fundamental frequency, late learners, phonetic discrimination, adult second language learners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review