The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing Shared Decision-Making Programs to Improve the Quality of Health Care
Open accessAbstract
We strongly believe in the importance of patient involvement in a medical decision. The interactive SDPs appear to be an effective way to facilitate this involvement. One key to the acceptance of these programs by patients and physicians is that they be--and be perceived as--fair, accurate, and balanced. Herein we have described the well-defined protocol for developing, evaluating, and updating SDPs. The first of the foundation's programs dealing with benign prostatic hyperplasia has been well received by patients and clinicians and has been demonstrated to have an impact on practice patterns. Efforts are under way to evaluate four additional programs, leading to widespread availability of the first five SDPs by fall of 1992.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fihn, S. D., Gardin, J. M., Abrams, J., Berra, K., Blankenship, J. C., Dallas, A. P., Douglas, P. S., Foody, J. M., Gerber, T. C., Hinderliter, A. L., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318277d6a0 · Cited by 845
Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions
Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00097-5 · Cited by 721
A systematic development process for patient decision aids
Coulter, A., Stilwell, D., Kryworuchko, J., Mullen, P. D., Ng, C. J., & van der Weijden, T. (2013) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s2 · Cited by 615
Braddock, C. H., Fihn, S. D., Levinson, W., Jonsen, A. R., & Pearlman, R. A. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-006-5081-x · Cited by 353
The Role of Chemotherapy at the End of Life: “When Is Enough, Enough?”
Harrington, S. E., & Smith, T. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.22.2667 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasper, J. F., Mulley, A. G., & Wennberg, J. E.
- Venue
- QRB - Quality Review Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 183-190
- ISSN
- 0097-5990 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2475355953
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing Shared Decision-Making Programs to Improve the Quality of Health Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30531-0
- The paper
- Kasper, J. F., Mulley, A. G., & Wennberg, J. E. (1992). Developing Shared Decision-Making Programs to Improve the Quality of Health Care. QRB - Quality Review Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30531-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
