The Role of Outcomes in Quality Assessment and Assurance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Donabedian three-dimensional quality structure is the main framework for constructing nursing-sensitive quality indicators.
“In 1966, Avedis Donabedian, a famous American scholar, proposed the theoretical model of a “three‐dimensional quality structure” (that is, medical quality should be classified into three dimensions, as structure, process and outcome) (Donabedian, 1992), which has become the main framework for constructing sensitive indicators of nursing quality.”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as Donabedian, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Young, A. E., Brookes, S. T., Avery, K. N. L., Davies, A., Metcalfe, C., & Blazeby, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.016 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Challenges in quality assessment of dental care
Bader, J. D. (2009) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0084 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Degni, F., Suominen, S. B., El Ansari, W., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K., & Essen, B. (2014) · Ethnicity & Health · doi:10.1080/13557858.2013.797567 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Construction of nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis using Delphi method
Gao, J., Liu, X., Che, W., & Xin, X. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14607 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Li, Q., & He, L. (2023) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.1349 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“…proposed the theoretical model of a “three- dimensional quality structure” (that is, medical quality should be classified into three dimensions, as structure, process and outcome) (Donabedian, 1992), which has become the main framework for constructing sensitive indicators of nursing quality.”
Background
- Authors
- Donabedian, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Donabedian, Avedis
- Venue
- QRB - Quality Review Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 356-360
- ISSN
- 0097-5990 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W112528857
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 17.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- QRB - Quality Review Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- person-centred care, nursing homes, long-term care quality, quality assurance, employee perceptions, Medicaid, organizational systems, work-related attitudes, job satisfaction, affective commitment, turnover intention, supportive work environment, nurses, direct care workers
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
