Cited by 57Dental Radiography and ImagingMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging and Analysis

Challenges in quality assessment of dental care

Bader, James D.·2009·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0084

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bader, J. D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Bader, James D.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
140
Issue
12
Pages
1456-1464
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067195854
Cited by
57
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
neutrosophic logic, fuzzy c-means clustering, region of interest selection, panoramic radiography, periodontal disease, dental caries screening, local binary pattern, gradient features, entropy features, patch-level features, oral diseases
MeSH terms
Dental Care, Educational Measurement, Humans, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Patient Satisfaction, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, Evidence-Based Dentistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review