Cited by 321Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth Culture and Social DynamicsBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence

Brown, B. Bradford, Eicher, Sue Ann, Petrie, Sandra·1986·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Many researchers have speculated about the role peer groups play in adolescent development, but few have examined teenagers' own perspective on the importance of group affiliations. The two studies reported here, involving 1,300 7th to 12th graders in three Midwestern U.S. communities, assessed teenagers' valuation of belonging to a "crowd" as well as the reasons they cited to support or oppose crowd affiliation. The importance of crowd affiliation declined across age. Younger adolescents generally favored membership, emphasizing the crowd's ability to provide emotional or instrumental support, foster friendships and facilitate social interaction. Older respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the conformity demands of crowds and felt their established friendship networks obviated the need for peer group ties. The importance of crowd affiliation was not related to the strength of respondents' sense of identity but did vary significantly with their willingness to conform to peers and the centrality of their position in peer groups or the type of crowd to which they belonged. Findings emphasized that adolescent peer groups can serve multiple functions, whose salience shifts with age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-1971(86)80029-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 321

Authors
Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., & Petrie, S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, B. Bradford
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
73-96
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2037474808
Cited by
321
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Culture and Social Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
peer groups, adolescent development, peer conformity, peer identity, social support, friendship networks, age differences, adolescents' perceptions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Ego, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Self Concept, Social Conformity, Social Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review