The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence
Abstract
Many researchers have speculated about the role peer groups play in adolescent development, but few have examined teenagers' own perspective on the importance of group affiliations. The two studies reported here, involving 1,300 7th to 12th graders in three Midwestern U.S. communities, assessed teenagers' valuation of belonging to a "crowd" as well as the reasons they cited to support or oppose crowd affiliation. The importance of crowd affiliation declined across age. Younger adolescents generally favored membership, emphasizing the crowd's ability to provide emotional or instrumental support, foster friendships and facilitate social interaction. Older respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the conformity demands of crowds and felt their established friendship networks obviated the need for peer group ties. The importance of crowd affiliation was not related to the strength of respondents' sense of identity but did vary significantly with their willingness to conform to peers and the centrality of their position in peer groups or the type of crowd to which they belonged. Findings emphasized that adolescent peer groups can serve multiple functions, whose salience shifts with age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The particular importance of the peer group for identity and support during this developmental stage may explain why loneliness is particularly problematic for young people.
“This may be because of the particular importance of the peer group for identity and support during this developmental stage.87 , 88”
From Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [87]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 321
- Authors
- Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., & Petrie, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, B. Bradford
- ORCID
- Brown, B. Bradford
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-96
- ISSN
- 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9254
- OpenAlex
- W2037474808
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Culture and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- peer groups, adolescent development, peer conformity, peer identity, social support, friendship networks, age differences, adolescents' perceptions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Ego, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Self Concept, Social Conformity, Social Identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review