Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care

Open access
Eggimann, Philippe, Harbarth, Stephan, Constantin, Marie-Noëlle, Touveneau, Sylvie, Chevrolet, Jean-Claude, Pittet, Didier·2000·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intravascular devices are a leading cause of nosocomial infection. Specific prevention strategies and improved guidelines for the use of intravascular devices can decrease the rate of infection; however, the impact of a combination of these strategies on rates of vascular-access infection in intensive-care units (ICUs) is not known. We implemented a multiple-approach prevention programme to decrease the occurrence of vascular-access infection in an 18-bed medical ICU at a tertiary centre. METHODS 3154 critically ill patients, admitted between October, 1995, and November, 1997, were included in a cohort study with longitudinal assessment of an overall catheter-care policy targeted at the reduction of vascular-access infections and based on an educational campaign for vascular-access insertion and on device use and care. Incidence of ICU-acquired infections was measured by means of on-site surveillance. FINDINGS 613 infections occurred in 353 patients (19.4 infections per 100 admissions). The incidence density of exit-site catheter infection was 9.2 episodes per 1000 patient-days before the intervention, and 3.3 episodes per 1000 patient-days afterwards (relative risk 0.36 [95% CI 0.20-0.63]). Corresponding rates for bloodstream infection were 11.3 and 3.8 episodes per 1000 patient-days, respectively (0.33 [0.20-0.56]) due to decreased rates of both microbiologically documented infections and clinical sepsis. Rates of respiratory and urinary-tract infections remained unchanged, whereas those of skin or mucous-membrane infections decreased from 11.4 to 7.0 episodes per 1000 patient-days (0.62 [0.41-0.93]). Overall, the incidence of nosocomial infections decreased from 52.4 to 34.0 episodes per 1000 patient-days (0.65 [0.54-0.78]). INTERPRETATION A multiple-approach prevention strategy, targeted at the insertion and maintenance of vascular access, can decrease rates of vascular-access infections and can have a substantial impact on the overall incidence of ICU-acquired infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02291-1

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Eggimann, P., Harbarth, S., Constantin, M.-N., Touveneau, S., Chevrolet, J.-C., & Pittet, D.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
355
Issue
9218
Pages
1864-1868
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2091270145
Cited by
444
References
20
FWCI
39.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02291-1
The paper
Eggimann, P., Harbarth, S., Constantin, M.-N., Touveneau, S., Chevrolet, J.-C., & Pittet, D. (2000). Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02291-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.