Cited by 16Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting IssuesGenital Health and DiseaseGlobal Health and Surgery

Tackling female genital cutting in Somalia

Ford, Nathan·2001·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06263-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, N.
Affiliations
Médecins Sans Frontières‎ (GB)
Corresponding author
Ford, Nathan
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
358
Issue
9288
Pages
1179
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2055825062
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Medecins Sans Frontieres Field Research (Medecins Sans Frontieres) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
female genital mutilation, Somalia, women's health, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Human Rights, Maternal Mortality, Somalia, Circumcision, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review