Cited by 352Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suicide risk in relation to family history of completed suicide and psychiatric disorders: a nested case-control study based on longitudinal registers

Abstract

Background Familial clustering of suicidal behaviour has been well documented. We aimed to assess whether family history of completed suicide and mental illness that results in admission to hospital are risk factors for suicide, and whether these factors interact.Methods We did a nested case-control study using data from Danish longitudinal registers. We included 4262 people who had committed suicide aged 9-45 years during 1981-97 (cases), and 80238 population-based controls matched for age, sex, and date of suicide. Suicide and psychiatric history of parents and siblings and socioeconomic, demographic, and psychiatric data for every case were retrieved and merged. Data were analysed with conditional logistic regression.Findings A family history of completed suicide and psychiatric illness significantly and independently increased suicide risk (odds ratio 2.58 [95% CI 1.84-3.61] and 1.31 [1.19-1.45], respectively). These effects were not accounted for by the socioeconomic status and psychiatric history of cases. A history of family psychiatric illness significantly raised suicide risk only in people without a history of psychiatric illness (1.55 [1.38-1.75]), whereas a family history of suicide increased suicide risk irrespective of psychiatric illness (2.37 [1.11-5.09] and 2.66 [1.82-3.88]) for people with and without a psychiatric history, respectively.Interpretation Completed suicide and psychiatric illness in relatives are risk factors for suicide, and the effect of family suicide history is independent of the familial cluster of mental disorders. Family history of suicide should be established in the assessment of suicide risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11197-4

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–351 of 351

Metadata

Authors
Qin, P., Agerbo, E., & Mortensen, P. B.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Qin, Ping
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
360
Issue
9340
Pages
1126-1130
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2122903417
Cited by
352
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicide risk, family history of suicide, mental illness, suicide risk factors, suicide risk assessment, parental mental illness, siblings, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cause of Death, Child, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Risk, Suicide, Cluster Analysis, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review