Cited by 0Travel-related health issuesDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Travel medicine

Open access
Lalloo, David·2003·The Lancet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15043-x

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Travel medicine

    Over three-quarters of the articles in the first two issues of Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease were authored by editorial board members.

    “more than three-quarters of the articles were written by members of the editorial board”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Travel medicine

    The editors of Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease struggled to attract submissions for the first two issues.

    “The editors clearly had difficulty attracting submissions for the first two issues”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § Travel medicine

    The 2002 UK infectious disease strategy Getting Ahead of the Curve identified potential population health threats from overseas travel.

    “Getting Ahead of the Curve, the 2002 UK strategy for infectious disease, noted the potential population health threats from overseas travel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Getting Ahead of the Curve
  • Interpretationcitation
    § Travel medicine

    The growth of travel medicine as a specialty is being driven by greater awareness of the public-health consequences of foreign travel.

    “The development and expansion of travel medicine as a specialty is also being driven by heightened awareness of the implications of foreign travel for public health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The anthrax attacks in the USA and the global spread of SARS increased concern about biohazards, drawing attention to the public-health implications of foreign travel.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given
    § Travel medicine

    Primary practice and nursing are noticeably under-represented on the editorial board of Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease.

    “although primary practice and nursing are noticeably under-represented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data
    § Travel medicine

    The first issue of Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease contains ten pages of editorial board biographies.

    “biographies of the board occupy ten pages of the first issue”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Travel medicine

    An editorial in Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease lists 18 categories of practitioners the journal aims to appeal to, but does not mention nurses.

    “18 different categories of which are listed in an editorial, although again there is no mention of nurses”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingreasoning
    § Travel medicine

    An editorial in Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease names the journal's intended topic areas, such as aviation psychological and behavioural issues.

    “The same editorial lists the topics on which the journal will focus, including “aviation psychological and behavioural issues””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Travel medicine

    The editorial's listed topics suggest a shift from the traditional narrow, infection-focused conception of travel medicine.

    “implying a move away from the traditionally narrow, heavily infection-biased view of travel medicine”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning
    § Travel medicine

    NaTHNaC aims to protect British travellers' health, develop the evidence base for travel medicine, provide standardised travel advice for health professionals, and improve surveillance of travel-related infections.

    “NaTHNaC seeks “to protect the health of British travellers” and will develop the evidence base for travel medicine, provide standardised travel advice for health professionals, and improve surveillance of travel-related infections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
6 of 6
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    UK citizens are making more overseas trips; the total exceeded 59 million in 2002.

    “The number of overseas trips made by UK citizens continues to increase; there were more than 59 million in 2002”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The demographic profile of travellers is shifting: more elderly and immuno-compromised individuals are taking exotic holidays, which raises demand for specialised travel-medicine services.

    “Foreign travel is no longer the prerogative of the young; rising numbers of elderly and immuno-compromised people are seeking exotic holidays and increasing the demand for specialised travel-medicine services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Improved travel-medicine services are needed.

    “The need for improved travel-medicine services has been recognised with the launch of NaTHNaC”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Travel medicine is now seen as encompassing more than just preventing infections associated with travel.

    “Travel medicine is increasingly recognised as being more than merely the prevention of travel-related infections”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The anthrax attacks in the USA and the global spread of SARS increased concern about biohazards, drawing attention to the public-health implications of foreign travel.

    “Interest in biohazards as a result of the anthrax attacks in the USA and the rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have further highlighted this issue.”
5 of 5

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Lalloo, D.
Affiliations
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Lalloo, David
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
362
Issue
9400
Pages
2030
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4205608117
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Keywords
travel medicine, travel-associated infection, primary care, travel health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review