The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom
Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T. (2014) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361314529627 · Cited by 800
“This situation is unlike research in other health-related areas (e.g. Chalmers, 2004; Partridge and Scadding, 2004), where there has been some steps towards reforming clinical research decision-making.”
ResultPollock, A., St George, B., Fenton, M., & Firkins, L. (2014) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00942.x · Cited by 401
Selecting outcome measures in mental health: the views of service users
Crawford, M. J., Robotham, D., Thana, L., Patterson, S., Weaver, T., Barber, R., Wykes, T., & Rose, D. (2011) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.577114 · Cited by 172
Patient-reported outcome measures: Are they patient-generated, patient-centred or patient-valued?
Trujols, J., Portella, M. J., Iraurgi, I., Campins, M. J., Siñol, N., & Cobos, J. P. D. L. (2013) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.3109/09638237.2012.734653 · Cited by 129
A Portfolio Analysis of Autism Research Funding in Australia, 2008–2017
den Houting, J., & Pellicano, E. (2019) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-019-04155-1 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Partridge, N., & Scadding, J.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 9449
- Pages
- 1923-1924
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2015956617
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17494-1
- The paper
- Partridge, N., & Scadding, J. (2004). The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17494-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
