The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Putting clinical trials into context
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- De Angelis, 2005, Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Lancet, 365, 1827, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66588-9 · DOI
- Gulmezoglu, 2005, WHO facilitates international collaboration in setting standards for clinical trial registration, Lancet, 365, 1829, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66589-0 · DOI
- Fergusson, 2005, Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?, Clin Trials, 2, 218, 10.1191/1740774505cn085oa · DOI · Paper page
- Chalmers, 2005, The scandalous failure of science to cumulate evidence scientifically, Clin Trials, 2, 229
- Gilbert, 2005, Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002, Int J Epidemiol, 10.1093/ije/dyi088 · DOI · Paper page
- Chalmers, 2005, Academia's failure to support systematic reviews, Lancet, 365, 469, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17854-4 · DOI
Cited by
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
“They help clinicians keep up-to-date; provide evidence for policy makers to judge risks, benefits, and harms of health care behaviors and interventions; gather together and summarize related research for patients and their carers; provide a starting point for clinical practice guideline developers; provide summaries o…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, C., & Horton, R.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 9480
- Pages
- 107-108
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2029163232
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Putting clinical trials into context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66846-8
- The paper
- Young, C., & Horton, R. (2005). Putting clinical trials into context. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66846-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
