Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 969

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial

Open access
Marson, Anthony G, Al-Kharusi, Asya M, Alwaidh, Muna, Appleton, Richard, Baker, Gus A, Chadwick, David W, Cramp, Celia, Cockerell, Oliver C, Cooper, Paul N, Doughty, Julie, Eaton, Barbara, Gamble, Carrol, Goulding, Peter J, Howell, Stephen JL, Hughes, Adrian, Jackson, Margaret, Jacoby, Ann, Kellett, Mark, Lawson, Geoffrey R, Leach, John Paul, Nicolaides, Paola, Roberts, Richard, Shackley, Phil, Shen, Jing, Smith, David F, Smith, Philip EM, Smith, Catrin Tudur, Vanoli, Alessandra, Williamson, Paula R·2007·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background Valproate is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with generalised onset seizures, and its broad spectrum of efficacy means it is recommended for patients with seizures that are difficult to classify. Lamotrigine and topiramate are also thought to possess broad spectrum activity. The SANAD study aimed to compare the longer-term effects of these drugs in patients with generalised onset seizures or seizures that are difficult to classify. Methods SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm B of the study recruited 716 patients for whom valproate was considered to be standard treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate between Jan 12, 1999, and Aug 31, 2004, and follow-up data were obtained up to Jan 13, 2006. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 1-year remission, and analysis was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748. Findings For time to treatment failure, valproate was significantly better than topiramate (hazard ratio 1·57 [95% CI 1·19–2·08]), but there was no significant difference between valproate and lamotrigine (1·25 [0·94–1·68]). For patients with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy, valproate was significantly better than both lamotrigine (1·55 [1·07–2·24] and topiramate (1·89 [1·32–2·70]). For time to 12-month remission valproate was significantly better than lamotrigine overall (0·76 [0·62–0·94]), and for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy 0·68 (0·53–0·89). But there was no significant difference between valproate and topiramate in either the analysis overall or for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Interpretation Valproate is better tolerated than topiramate and more efficacious than lamotrigine, and should remain the drug of first choice for many patients with generalised and unclassified epilepsies. However, because of known potential adverse effects of valproate during pregnancy, the benefits for seizure control in women of childbearing years should be considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60461-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 969

Metadata

Authors
Marson, A. G., Al-Kharusi, A. M., Alwaidh, M., Appleton, R., Baker, G. A., Chadwick, D. W., Cramp, C., Cockerell, O. C., Cooper, P. N., Doughty, J., Eaton, B., Gamble, C., Goulding, P. J., Howell, S. J., Hughes, A., Jackson, M., Jacoby, A., Kellett, M., Lawson, G. R., Leach, J. P., Nicolaides, P., Roberts, R., Shackley, P., Shen, J., Smith, D. F., Smith, P. E., Smith, C. T., Vanoli, A., & Williamson, P. R.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
369
Issue
9566
Pages
1016-1026
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2147974822
Cited by
969
References
1
FWCI
34.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60461-9
The paper
Marson, A. G., Al-Kharusi, A. M., Alwaidh, M., Appleton, R., Baker, G. A., Chadwick, D. W., Cramp, C., Cockerell, O. C., Cooper, P. N., Doughty, J., Eaton, B., Gamble, C., Goulding, P. J., Howell, S. J., Hughes, A., Jackson, M., Jacoby, A., Kellett, M., Lawson, G. R., . . . Williamson, P. R. (2007). The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60461-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.