Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data

Hill, Kenneth, Thomas, Kevin, AbouZahr, Carla, Walker, Neff, Say, Lale, Inoue, Mie, Suzuki, Emi·2007·The Lancet

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61572-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bouvier-Colle, 1991, Reasons for the underreporting of maternal mortality in France, as indicated by a survey of all deaths among women of childbearing age, Int J Epidemiol, 20, 717, 10.1093/ije/20.3.717 · DOI
  2. 1991, Perspectives in disease prevention and health promotion enhanced maternal mortality surveillance—North Carolina, 1988 and 1989, MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep, 40, 469
  3. 1991, Current trends maternal mortality surveillance—Puerto Rico, 1989, MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep, 40, 521
  4. Atrash, 1995, Maternal mortality in developed countries: not just a concern of the past, Obstet Gynecol, 86, 700, 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00200-B · DOI
  5. Gissler, 1997, Pregnancy-associated deaths in Finland 1987–1994—definition problems and benefits of record linkage, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 76, 651, 10.3109/00016349709024605 · DOI
  6. Turner, 2002, Under-reporting of maternal mortality in Canada: a question of definition, Chronic Dis Can, 23, 22
  7. Karimian-Teherani, 2002, Under-reporting of direct and indirect obstetrical deaths in Austria, 1980–98, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 81, 323, 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810408.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bouvier-Colle, 2004, Maternal mortality estimation in France, according to a new method, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 33, 421, 10.1016/S0368-2315(04)96550-7 · DOI
  9. Mathers, 2005, Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data, Bull World Health Organ, 83, 171
  10. Stanton, 2000, An assessment of DHS maternal mortality indicators, Stud Fam Plan, 31, 111, 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00111.x · DOI
  11. Gakidou, 2004, Adult mortality: time for a reappraisal, Int J Epidemiol, 33, 710, 10.1093/ije/dyh099 · DOI
  12. Stecklov, 1995, Maternal mortality estimation: separating pregnacy-related and non-pregnancy related risks, Stud Fam Plan, 26, 33, 10.2307/2138049 · DOI
  13. Shahidullah, 1995, The sisterhood method of estimating maternal mortality: the Matlab experience, Stud Fam Plan, 26, 101, 10.2307/2137935 · DOI
  14. Stanton, 2001, Every death counts: measuring maternal mortality via a census, Bull World Health Organ, 79, 657

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Hill, K., Thomas, K., AbouZahr, C., Walker, N., Say, L., Inoue, M., & Suzuki, E.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
370
Issue
9595
Pages
1311-1319
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2126574966
Cited by
469
References
2
FWCI
51.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61572-4
The paper
Hill, K., Thomas, K., AbouZahr, C., Walker, N., Say, L., Inoue, M., & Suzuki, E. (2007). Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61572-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.