Cited by 474Reproductive Health and ContraceptionInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide

Sedgh, Gilda, Henshaw, Stanley, Singh, Susheela, Åhman, Elisabeth, Shah, Iqbal H·2007·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Information on incidence of induced abortion is crucial for identifying policy and programmatic needs aimed at reducing unintended pregnancy. Because unsafe abortion is a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, measures of its incidence are also important for monitoring progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. We present new worldwide estimates of abortion rates and trends and discuss their implications for policies and programmes to reduce unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion and to increase access to safe abortion. Methods The worldwide and regional incidences of safe abortions in 2003 were calculated by use of reports from official national reporting systems, nationally representative surveys, and published studies. Unsafe abortion rates in 2003 were estimated from hospital data, surveys, and other published studies. Demographic techniques were applied to estimate numbers of abortions and to calculate rates and ratios for 2003. UN estimates of female populations and livebirths were the source for denominators for rates and ratios, respectively. Regions are defined according to UN classifications. Trends in abortion rates and incidences between 1995 and 2003 are presented. Findings An estimated 42 million abortions were induced in 2003, compared with 46 million in 1995. The induced abortion rate in 2003 was 29 per 1000 women aged 15-44 years, down from 35 in 1995. Abortion rates were lowest in western Europe (12 per 1000 women). Rates were 17 per 10…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61575-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High abortion rates prevail in countries where abortion is legally restricted, whereas comparatively lower abortion rates of 12-17 per 1000 women have been reported in western and northern Europe, where abortion is permitted on broad grounds.

    “Hence, high abortion rates prevail in countries where the procedure is legally restricted, whereas comparatively lower abortion rates of 12-17 have been reported in, for example, western and northern Europe, where abortion is permitted on broad grounds (12).”

    From Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview (2011) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sedgh, G., Henshaw, S., Singh, S., Åhman, E., & Shah, I. H.
Affiliations
  • Guttmacher Institute (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Sedgh, Gilda
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
370
Issue
9595
Pages
1338-1345
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1979531284
Cited by
474
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 48
FWCI
39.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
abortion, abortion rates, unsafe abortion, safe abortion, abortion trends, unintended pregnancy, maternal mortality, Millennium Development Goal 5, developing countries, contraceptive access, global estimates
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Developing Countries, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Pregnancy, Global Health, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review