Cited by 780Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Beswick, Andrew D, Rees, Karen, Dieppe, Paul, Ayis, Salma, Gooberman-Hill, Rachael, Horwood, Jeremy, Ebrahim, Shah·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Background In old age, reduction in physical function leads to loss of independence, the need for hospital and long-term nursing-home care, and premature death. We did a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of community-based complex interventions in preservation of physical function and independence in elderly people.Methods We searched systematically for randomised controlled trials assessing community-based multifactorial interventions in elderly people (mean age at least 65 years) living at home with at least 6 months of follow-up. Outcomes studied were living at home, death, nursing-home and hospital admissions, falls, and physical function. We did a meta-analysis of the extracted data.Findings We identified 89 trials including 97 984 people. Interventions reduced the risk of not living at home (relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97). Interventions reduced nursing-home admissions (0.87, 0.83-0.90), but not death (1.00, 0.97-1.02). Risk of hospital admissions (0.94, 0.91-0.97) and falls (0.90, 0.86-0.95) were reduced, and physical function (standardised mean difference -0.08, -0.11 to -0.06) was better in the intervention groups than in other groups. Benefit for any specific type or intensity of intervention was not noted. In populations with increased death rates, interventions were associated with reduced nursing-home admission. Benefit in trials was particularly evident in studies started before 1993.Interpretation Complex interventions can help elderly people to live safely and independently, and could be tailored to meet individuals' needs and preferences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60342-6

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 118 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 780

Metadata

Authors
Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Beswick, Andrew D
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
371
Issue
9614
Pages
725-735
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2123193855
Cited by
780
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 48
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
complex interventions, multifactorial intervention, physical function, independent living, older adults, community-based intervention, nursing home admission, hospitalization, falls, mortality
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Health Status, Humans, Mortality, Patient Discharge, Risk, Geriatric Assessment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Frail Elderly, Housing for the Elderly, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review