Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 713

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step Study: a case–cohort analysis

Open access
McElrath, M Juliana, De Rosa, Stephen C, Moodie, Zoe, Dubey, Sheri, Kierstead, Lisa, Janes, Holly, Defawe, Olivier D, Carter, Donald K, Hural, John, Akondy, Rama, Buchbinder, Susan P, Robertson, Michael N, Mehrotra, Devan V, Self, Steven G, Corey, Lawrence, Shiver, John W, Casimiro, Danilo R·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Background In the Step Study, the MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine did not lower post-infection plasma viremia, and HIV-1 incidence was higher in vaccine-treated than placebo-treated males with pre-existing adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) immunity. We evaluated vaccine-induced immunity and its potential contributions to infection risk. Methods To assess immunogenicity, HIV-specific T-cells were characterized ex vivo using validated IFN-γ ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays, employing a case-cohort design. To determine effects of vaccine and pre-existing Ad5 immunity on infection risk, flow cytometric studies measured Ad5-specific T-cells and circulating activated (Ki67+/Bcl- 2lo) CD4+ T-cells expressing CCR5. Findings IFN-γ-secreting HIV-specific T-cells (range, 163–686/106 PBMC) were detected ex vivo by ELISpot in 77% (258/354) of vaccinees; the majority recognized 2–3 HIV proteins. HIV- specific CD4+ T-cells were identified by ICS in 41%; ~85% expressed IL-2, and two-thirds of these co-expressed IFN-γ and/or TNF-α. HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells (range, 0.4–1.0%) were observed in 73%, expressing predominantly either IFN-γ alone or with TNF-α. No major differences were found in vaccine-induced HIV-specific immunity, including response rate, magnitude, and cytokine profile comparing vaccinated male cases (pre-infection) with non-cases. Interestingly, Ad5-specific T-cells were lower in cases than non-cases in several subgroup analyses. The percent circulating Ki67+Bcl-2lo/CCR5+ CD4+ T-cells did not differ between cases and non-cases. Interpretation Consistent with previous trials, the MrkAd5/HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine was highly immunogenic for inducing HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells. Comparative analyses did not reveal differences in HIV-specific immunologic responses between cases and non-cases that explain the lack of vaccine efficacy and potential infection enhancement. If T-cell immunity is critical in vaccine-induced HIV protection, our findings suggest that future candidate vaccines must elicit responses that either exceed in magnitude or differ in breadth and/or function from those observed in this trial. Funding National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U.S. National Institute of Health; Merck Research Laboratories

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61592-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 713

Metadata

Authors
McElrath, M. J., De Rosa, S. C., Moodie, Z., Dubey, S., Kierstead, L., Janes, H., Defawe, O. D., Carter, D. K., Hural, J., Akondy, R., Buchbinder, S. P., Robertson, M. N., Mehrotra, D. V., Self, S. G., Corey, L., Shiver, J. W., & Casimiro, D. R.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
372
Issue
9653
Pages
1894-1905
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2162891851
Cited by
713
References
2
FWCI
29.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step Study: a case–cohort analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61592-5
The paper
McElrath, M. J., De Rosa, S. C., Moodie, Z., Dubey, S., Kierstead, L., Janes, H., Defawe, O. D., Carter, D. K., Hural, J., Akondy, R., Buchbinder, S. P., Robertson, M. N., Mehrotra, D. V., Self, S. G., Corey, L., Shiver, J. W., & Casimiro, D. R. (2008). HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step Study: a case–cohort analysis. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61592-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.