Cited by 1,713HIV Research and TreatmentHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial

Open access
Buchbinder, Susan P, Mehrotra, Devan V, Duerr, Ann, Fitzgerald, Daniel W, Mogg, Robin, Li, David, Gilbert, Peter B, Lama, Javier R +8 more·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Observational data and non-human primate challenge studies suggest that cell-mediated immune responses might provide control of HIV replication. The Step Study directly assessed the efficacy of a cell-mediated immunity vaccine to protect against HIV-1 infection or change in early plasma HIV-1 levels. Methods We undertook a double-blind, phase II, test-of-concept study at 34 sites in North America, the Caribbean, South America, and Australia. We randomly assigned 3000 HIV-1-seronegative participants by computer-generated assignments to receive three injections of MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine (n=1494) or placebo (n=1506). Randomisation was prestratified by sex, adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) antibody titre at baseline, and study site. Primary objective was a reduction in HIV-1 acquisition rates (tested every 6 months) or a decrease in HIV-1 viral-load setpoint (early plasma HIV-1 RNA measured 3 months after HIV-1 diagnosis). Analyses were per protocol and modified intention to treat. The study was stopped early because it unexpectedly met the prespecified futility boundaries at the first interim analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00095576. Findings In a prespecified interim analysis in participants with baseline Ad5 antibody titre 200 or less, 24 (3%) of 741 vaccine recipients became HIV-1 infected versus 21 (3%) of 762 placebo recipients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2 [95% CI 0.6-2.2]). All but one infection occurred in men. The corresponding geometric mean plasma HIV-1 RNA was comparable in infected male vaccine and placebo recipients (4.61 vs 4.41 log(10) copies per mL, one tailed p value for potential benefit 0.66). The vaccine elicited interferon-gamma ELISPOT responses in 75% (267) of the 25% random sample of all vaccine recipients (including both low and high Ad5 antibody titres) on whose specimens this testing was done (n=354). In exploratory analyses of all study volunteers, irrespective of baseline Ad5 antibody titre, the HR of HIV-1 infection between vaccine and placebo recipients was higher in Ad5 seropositive men (HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.2-4.3]) and uncircumcised men (3.8 [1.5-9.3]), but was not increased in Ad5 seronegative (1.0 [0.5-1.9]) or circumcised (1.0 [0.6-1.7]) men. Interpretation This cell-mediated immunity vaccine did not prevent HIV-1 infection or reduce early viral level. Mechanisms for insufficient efficacy of the vaccine and the increased HIV-1 infection rates in subgroups of vaccine recipients are being explored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61591-3

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term homologous prime-boost with identical viral-vectored vaccines may be limited by anti-vector immunity.

    “In the long term, a strategy involving homologous prime–boost with identical viral-vectored vaccines may be limited by anti-vector immunity12,91,92.”
  • Gam-COVID-Vac uses different adenovirus vectors for each dose, which circumvents anti-vector immunity that could inhibit anti-S responses, as seen with Ad5-nCoV and non-COVID-19 adenovirus-based vaccines.

    “This may be, in part, due to the fact that Gam-COVID-Vac uses different adenovirus vectors for each dose (adenovirus 26 for dose one and adenovirus 5 for dose two), thus circumventing the potential problem of anti-vector immunity that could inhibit anti-S responses, as has been identified for Ad5-nCoV (refs12,91) (Table 1) and non-COVID-19 adenovirus-based vaccines92.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Haynes BF Montefiori DC Aiming to induce broadly reactive neutralizing antibody responses with HIV-1 vaccine candidates Expert Rev Vaccines 2006 Aug 5 4 579 95 16989638
  2. [28]Harro C Edupuganti S Goepfert P Priddy F Lally M Shiver J Safety and Immunogenicity of Adenovirus Type 5 (Ad5) HIV-1 gag Vaccines 12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections Poster 504, G-115 2005
  3. [35]Seage GR III Holte SE Metzger D Koblin BA Gross M Celum C Are US populations appropriate for trials of human immunodeficiency virus vaccine? The HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Am J Epidemiol 2001 Apr 1 153 7 619 27 11282787

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchbinder, S. P., Mehrotra, D. V., Duerr, A., Fitzgerald, D. W., Mogg, R., Li, D., Gilbert, P. B., Lama, J. R., Marmor, M., del Rio, C., McElrath, M. J., Casimiro, D. R., Gottesdiener, K. M., Chodakewitz, J. A., Corey, L., & Robertson, M. N.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco Department of Public Health (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación (PE)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
372
Issue
9653
Pages
1881-1893
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2153670011
Cited by
1,713
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 171 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 162
FWCI
51.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454, 5m01rr000079-42)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI050409, UM1AI069496)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR000079)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
HIV-1 vaccine, cell-mediated immunity, adenovirus type 5, HIV-1 acquisition, interferon-gamma, vaccine efficacy, futility, STEP study, early HIV-1 infection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, HIV Antigens, HIV-1, HIV Infections, Proportional Hazards Models, AIDS Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review