Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic syndrome and salt sensitivity of blood pressure in non-diabetic people in China: a dietary intervention study

Open access
Chen, Jing, Gu, Dongfeng, Huang, Jianfeng, Rao, Dabeeru C, Jaquish, Cashell E, Hixson, James E, Chen, Chung-Shiuan, Chen, Jichun, Lu, Fanghong, Hu, Dongsheng, Rice, Treva, Kelly, Tanika N, Hamm, L Lee, Whelton, Paul K, He, Jiang·2009·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background We aimed to examine the association between the metabolic syndrome and salt-sensitivity of blood pressure (BP). Methods 1,906 Chinese aged ≥16 years without diabetes were fed a low-sodium diet (51.3 mmol/day) for 7 days followed by a high-sodium diet (307.8 mmol/day) for an additional 7 days. BP were measured at baseline and at the end of each intervention period using a random-zero sphygmomanometer. Metabolic syndrome was defined as the presence of ≥3 risk factors: abdominal obesity, high triglyceride, low high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol, elevated BP, and elevated glucose. Findings Multivariable-adjusted mean changes (95% confidence intervals) in BP (mmHg) were significantly greater (all p<0.0001) among participants with compared to those without the metabolic syndrome: −7.34 (−8.21, −6.46) versus −5.17 (−5.51, −4.83) for systolic BP and −4.56 (−5.28, −3.85) versus −2.47 (−2.74, −2.19) for diastolic BP during the low-sodium intervention; and 6.51 (5.76, 7.26) versus 4.55 (4.26, 4.84) for systolic BP and 3.25 (2.56, 3.94) versus 1.69 (1.42, 1.96) for diastolic BP during the high-sodium intervention. In addition, compared to those with zero, participants with 4 or 5 risk factors for the metabolic syndrome had a 3.54-fold increased odds (2.05, 6.11) of high salt-sensitivity during the low-sodium intervention and a 3.13-fold increased odds (1.80, 5.43) of high salt-sensitivity during the high-sodium intervention. Interpretation These results suggest that the metabolic syndrome significantly enhances BP response to sodium intake. Reduction in sodium intake may be an especially important component in reducing BP among patients with multiple risk factors for the metabolic syndrome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60144-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J., Gu, D., Huang, J., Rao, D. C., Jaquish, C. E., Hixson, J. E., Chen, C.-S., Chen, J., Lu, F., Hu, D., Rice, T., Kelly, T. N., Hamm, L. L., Whelton, P. K., & He, J.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
373
Issue
9666
Pages
829-835
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2159933178
Cited by
249
References
5
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic syndrome and salt sensitivity of blood pressure in non-diabetic people in China: a dietary intervention study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60144-6
The paper
Chen, J., Gu, D., Huang, J., Rao, D. C., Jaquish, C. E., Hixson, J. E., Chen, C.-S., Chen, J., Lu, F., Hu, D., Rice, T., Kelly, T. N., Hamm, L. L., Whelton, P. K., & He, J. (2009). Metabolic syndrome and salt sensitivity of blood pressure in non-diabetic people in China: a dietary intervention study. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60144-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.