The African Network for Drugs and Diagnostics Innovation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some capacity strengthening activities have been initiated through grants from the developed world to address problems in ethics and regulatory approval systems.
“To address these problems in the ethics and regulatory approval systems, some capacity strengthening activities have been initiated through grants from the developed world [70].”
From Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—A systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [70]
Cites
Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases
Nwaka, S., & Hudson, A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2144 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Bamako call to action: research for health
Lancet, T. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61789-4 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Accelerating Health Product Innovation in sub-Saharan Africa
Masum, H., Daar, A., Al-Bader, S., Shah, R., & Singer, P. (2007) · Innovations Technology Governance Globalization · doi:10.1162/itgg.2007.2.4.129 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world
Peeling, R. W., & Mabey, D. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03279.x · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—A systematic review
Alemayehu, C., Mitchell, G., & Nikles, J. (2018) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-018-0748-6 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mboya-Okeyo, T., Ridley, R. G., & Nwaka, S.
- Affiliations
- United Nations (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Nwaka, Solomon
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 9674
- Pages
- 1507-1508
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2165353562
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Biotechnology and Related Fields
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
- Keywords
- health research and development, drug development, research capacity building, healthcare innovation, Africa, developing countries
- MeSH terms
- Academies and Institutes, Africa, Clinical Trials as Topic, Developing Countries, Diffusion of Innovation, Drug Evaluation, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Research Support as Topic, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review