Cited by 1,413Healthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Systems and PracticesPublic Health and Social Inequalities

The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges

Coovadia, Hoosen, Jewkes, Rachel, Barron, Peter, Sanders, David, McIntyre, Diane·2009·The Lancet

Abstract

The roots of a dysfunctional health system and the collision of the epidemics of communicable and non-communicable diseases in South Africa can be found in policies from periods of the country's history, from colonial subjugation, apartheid dispossession, to the post-apartheid period. Racial and gender discrimination, the migrant labour system, the destruction of family life, vast income inequalities, and extreme violence have all formed part of South Africa's troubled past, and all have inexorably affected health and health services. In 1994, when apartheid ended, the health system faced massive challenges, many of which still persist. Macroeconomic policies, fostering growth rather than redistribution, contributed to the persistence of economic disparities between races despite a large expansion in social grants. The public health system has been transformed into an integrated, comprehensive national service, but failures in leadership and stewardship and weak management have led to inadequate implementation of what are often good policies. Pivotal facets of primary health care are not in place and there is a substantial human resources crisis facing the health sector. The HIV epidemic has contributed to and accelerated these challenges. All of these factors need to be addressed by the new government if health is to be improved and the Millennium Development Goals achieved in South Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60951-x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coovadia, H., Jewkes, R., Barron, P., Sanders, D., & McIntyre, D.
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
374
Issue
9692
Pages
817-834
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2142534753
Cited by
1,413
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 63
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
health care system, South Africa, apartheid, colonialism, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, migrant labour, income inequality, HIV/AIDS epidemic, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, primary care, health workforce shortage, health policy implementation, social grants, Millennium Development Goals
MeSH terms
Health Workforce, Humans, Mining, National Health Programs, Politics, Prejudice, Public Health, Race Relations, Sexual Behavior, South Africa, Transients and Migrants, Violence, Women's Rights, HIV Infections, Private Sector, Colonialism, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review