Cited by 41Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryMental Health Treatment and Access

The unchanging mortality gap for people with schizophrenia.

Chwastiak, Lydia A, Tek, Cenk·2009·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61072-2

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chwastiak, L. A., & Tek, C.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Chwastiak, Lydia A
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
374
Issue
9690
Pages
590-592
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1991263250
Cited by
41
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
schizophrenia, mortality gap, health disparities, antipsychotic drugs, clozapine, atypical antipsychotics, long-term antipsychotic treatment, mortality trends
MeSH terms
Finland, Humans, Life Expectancy, National Health Programs, Registries, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Case-Control Studies, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review