Cited by 772Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial

Open access
Vaidya, Jayant S, Joseph, David J, Tobias, Jeffrey S, Bulsara, Max, Wenz, Frederik, Saunders, Christobel, Alvarado, Michael, Flyger, Henrik L +16 more·2010·The Lancet

Abstract

Background After breast-conserving surgery, 90% of local recurrences occur within the index quadrant despite the presence of multicentric cancers elsewhere in the breast. Thus, restriction of radiation therapy to the tumour bed during surgery might be adequate for selected patients. We compared targeted intraoperative radiotherapy with the conventional policy of whole breast external beam radiotherapy.Methods Having safely piloted the new technique of single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy with Intrabeam, we launched the TARGIT-A trial on March 24, 2000. In this prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial, women aged 45 years or older with invasive ductal breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery were enrolled from 28 centres in nine countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive targeted intraoperative radiotherapy or whole breast external beam radiotherapy, with blocks stratified by centre and by timing of delivery of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy. Neither patients nor investigators or their teams were masked to treatment assignment. Postoperative discovery of predefined factors (eg, lobular carcinoma) could trigger addition of external beam radiotherapy to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (in an expected 15% of patients). The primary outcome was local recurrence in the conserved breast. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 2.5% in the primary endpoint. All randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00983684.Findings 1113 patients were randomly allocated to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy and 1119 were allocated to external beam radiotherapy. Of 996 patients who received the allocated treatment in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy group, 854 (86%) received targeted intraoperative radiotherapy only and 142 (14%) received targeted intraoperative radiotherapy plus external beam radiotherapy. 1025 (92%) patients in the external beam radiotherapy group received the allocated treatment. At 4 years, there were six local recurrences in the intraoperative radiotherapy group and five in the external beam radiotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of local recurrence in the conserved breast at 4 years was 1.20% (95% CI 0.53-2.71) in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy and 0.95% (0.39-2.31) in the external beam radiotherapy group (difference between groups 0.25%, -1.04 to 1.54; p=0.41). The frequency of any complications and major toxicity was similar in the two groups (for major toxicity, targeted intraoperative radiotherapy, 37 [3.3%] of 1113 vs external beam radiotherapy, 44 [3.9%] of 1119; p=0.44). Radiotherapy toxicity (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3) was lower in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy group (six patients [0.5%]) than in the external beam radiotherapy group (23 patients [2.1%]; p=0.002).Interpretation For selected patients with early breast cancer, a single dose of radiotherapy delivered at the time of surgery by use of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy should be considered as an alternative to external beam radiotherapy delivered over several weeks.Funding University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, UCLH Charities, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, Ninewells Cancer Campaign, National Health and Medical Research Council, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60837-9

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR, Hellman S, Cohen RB. Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in stage I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy. Cancer 1984; 53: 1049-57.
  2. Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Torhorst J, et al. Conservation therapy for breast cancers other than infi ltrating ductal carcinoma. Cancer 1989; 63: 1630-35.
  3. Belletti B, Vaidya JS, D'Andrea S, et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) impairs surgical wound-stimulated breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 1325-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaidya, J. S., Joseph, D. J., Tobias, J. S., Bulsara, M., Wenz, F., Saunders, C., Alvarado, M., Flyger, H. L., Massarut, S., Eiermann, W., Keshtgar, M., Dewar, J., Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U., Sütterlin, M., Esserman, L., Holtveg, H. M., Roncadin, M., Pigorsch, S., Metaxas, M., Falzon, M., Matthews, A., Corica, T., Williams, N. R., & Baum, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • Ninewells Hospital (GB)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • National Cancer Research Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Vaidya, Jayant S
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
376
Issue
9735
Pages
91-102
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2133494786
Cited by
772
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 114 · 2012: 93
FWCI
28.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (07/60/49)
  • University College London
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 01ZP0508)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Medical Research Council
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
targeted intraoperative radiotherapy, whole breast irradiation, breast-conserving surgery, invasive ductal carcinoma, local recurrence, non-inferiority, INTRABEAM, adjuvant radiotherapy, TARGIT-A trial, lobular carcinoma, multicentric breast cancer, single-fraction radiotherapy, external beam radiotherapy, breast cancer treatment outcomes, intention-to-treat analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Care, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Radiotherapy Dosage, Mastectomy, Segmental, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Disease-Free Survival, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review