Cited by 173Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyMalaria Research and ControlPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Effect of the Affordable Medicines Facility—malaria (AMFm) on the availability, price, and market share of quality-assured artemisinin-based combination therapies in seven countries: a before-and-after analysis of outlet survey data

Tougher, Sarah, Ye, Yazoume, Amuasi, John H, Kourgueni, Idrissa A, Thomson, Rebecca, Goodman, Catherine, Mann, Andrea G, Ren, Ruilin +21 more·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Malaria is one of the greatest causes of mortality worldwide. Use of the most effective treatments for malaria remains inadequate for those in need, and there is concern over the emergence of resistance to these treatments. In 2010, the Global Fund launched the Affordable Medicines Facility--malaria (AMFm), a series of national-scale pilot programmes designed to increase the access and use of quality-assured artemisinin based combination therapies (QAACTs) and reduce that of artemisinin monotherapies for treatment of malaria. AMFm involves manufacturer price negotiations, subsidies on the manufacturer price of each treatment purchased, and supporting interventions such as communications campaigns. We present findings on the effect of AMFm on QAACT price, availability, and market share, 6-15 months after the delivery of subsidised ACTs in Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Niger, Nigeria, Uganda, and Tanzania (including Zanzibar). Methods We did nationally representative baseline and endpoint surveys of public and private sector outlets that stock antimalarial treatments. QAACTs were identified on the basis of the Global Fund's quality assurance policy. Changes in availability, price, and market share were assessed against specified success benchmarks for 1 year of AMFm implementation. Key informant interviews and document reviews recorded contextual factors and the implementation process. Findings In all pilots except Niger and Madagascar, there were large increases in QAACT availability (25·8-51·9 percentage points), and market share (15·9-40·3 percentage points), driven mainly by changes in the private for-profit sector. Large falls in median price for QAACTs per adult equivalent dose were seen in the private for-profit sector in six pilots, ranging from US$1·28 to $4·82. The market share of oral artemisinin monotherapies decreased in Nigeria and Zanzibar, the two pilots where it was more than 5% at baseline. Interpretation Subsidies combined with supporting interventions can be effective in rapidly improving availability, price, and market share of QAACTs, particularly in the private for-profit sector. Decisions about the future of AMFm should also consider the effect on use in vulnerable populations, access to malaria diagnostics, and cost-effectiveness. Funding The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61732-2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tougher, S., Ye, Y., Amuasi, J. H., Kourgueni, I. A., Thomson, R., Goodman, C., Mann, A. G., Ren, R., Willey, B. A., Adegoke, C. A., Amin, A., Ansong, D., Bruxvoort, K., Diallo, D. A., Diap, G., Festo, C., Johanes, B., Juma, E., Kalolella, A., Malam, O., Mberu, B., Ndiaye, S., Nguah, S. B., Seydou, M., Taylor, M., Rueda, S. T., Wamukoya, M., Arnold, F., & Hanson, K.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Ifakara Health Institute (TZ)
  • ICF International (United States) (US)
  • Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (GH)
  • Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (CH)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • African Population and Health Research Center (KE)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (SN)
Corresponding author
Tougher, Sarah
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
380
Issue
9857
Pages
1916-1926
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2122992752
Cited by
173
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
FWCI
54.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2014-11-22)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
Affordable Medicines Facility-malaria, artemisinin-based combination therapy, drug availability, market share, artemisinin monotherapy, drug subsidies, public sector, malaria treatment access, Global Fund, antimalarial drug resistance, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Niger, Nigeria, Uganda, Tanzania
MeSH terms
Africa, Antimalarials, Humans, Lactones, Malaria, Marketing of Health Services, Pharmacies, Pilot Projects, Drug Costs, Private Sector, Public Sector, Artemisinins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review