The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model
Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. M. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00885.x · Cited by 2,025
Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008
Sedgh, G., Singh, S., Shah, I. H., Åhman, E., Henshaw, S. K., & Bankole, A. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61786-8 · Cited by 607
The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning
Canning, D., & Schultz, T. P. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60827-7 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Bhutta, Z. A., Das, J. K., Rizvi, A., Gaffey, M. F., Walker, N., Horton, S., Webb, P., Lartey, A., & Black, R. E. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60996-4 · Cited by 3,093
Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends
Sedgh, G., Bearak, J., Singh, S., Bankole, A., Popinchalk, A., Ganatra, B., Rossier, C., Gerdts, C., Tunçalp, Ö., Johnson, B. R., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30380-4 · Cited by 766
Self-citationBearak, J., Popinchalk, A., Alkema, L., & Sedgh, G. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30029-9 · Cited by 691
Self-citationSedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2014) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x · Cited by 417
Sobotka, T. (2017) · Journal of Biosocial Science · doi:10.1017/s0021932017000323 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Alkema, L., Kantorova, V., Menozzi, C., & Biddlecom, A.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 9878
- Pages
- 1642-1652
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2078339431
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 45.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62204-1
- The paper
- Alkema, L., Kantorova, V., Menozzi, C., & Biddlecom, A. (2013). National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62204-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
