Cited by 2,025Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceOptimal Experimental Design MethodsStatistical Methods and Applications

Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model

Lindley, D. V., Smith, A. F. M.·1972·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary The usual linear statistical model is reanalyzed using Bayesian methods and the concept of exchangeability. The general method is illustrated by applications to two-factor experimental designs and multiple regression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00885.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1972-09-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W128740895
Cited by
2,025
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 89
FWCI
27.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
Bayesian estimation, linear statistical models, exchangeability, multiple linear regression, prior distributions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review