The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background BCG vaccination provides incomplete protection against tuberculosis in infants. A new vaccine, modified Vaccinia Ankara virus expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A), was designed to enhance the protective efficacy of BCG. We aimed to assess safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of MVA85A against tuberculosis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in infants. Methods In our double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, we enrolled healthy infants (aged 4–6 months) without HIV infection who had previously received BCG vaccination. We randomly allocated infants (1:1), according to an independently generated sequence with block sizes of four, to receive one intradermal dose of MVA85A or an equal volume of Candida skin test antigen as placebo at a clinical facility in a rural region near Cape Town, South Africa. We actively followed up infants every 3 months for up to 37 months. The primary study outcome was safety (incidence of adverse and serious adverse events) in all vaccinated participants, but we also assessed efficacy in a protocol-defined group of participants who received at least one dose of allocated vaccine. The primary efficacy endpoint was incident tuberculosis incorporating microbiological, radiological, and clinical criteria, and the secondary efficacy endpoint was M tuberculosis infection according to QuantiFERON TB Gold In-tube conversion (Cellestis, Australia). This trial was registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Register (DOH-27-0109-2654) and with ClinicalTrials.gov on July 31, 2009, number NCT00953927 Findings Between July 15, 2009, and May 4, 2011, we enrolled 2797 infants (1399 allocated MVA85A and 1398 allocated placebo). Median follow-up in the per-protocol population was 24·6 months (IQR 19·2–28·1), and did not differ between groups. More infants who received MVA85A than controls had at least one local adverse event (1251 [89%] of 1399 MVA85A recipients and 628 [45%] of 1396 controls who received the allocated intervention) but the numbers of infants with systemic adverse events (1120 [80%] and 1059 [76%]) or serious adverse events (257 [18%] and 258 (18%) did not differ between groups. None of the 648 serious adverse events in these 515 infants was related to MVA85A. 32 (2%) of 1399 MVA85A recipients met the primary efficacy endpoint (tuberculosis incidence of 1·15 per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·79 to 1·62]; with conversion in 178 [13%] of 1398 infants [95% CI 11·0 to 14·6]) as did 39 (3%) of 1395 controls (1·39 per 100 person-years [1·00 to 1·91]; with conversion in 171 [12%] of 1394 infants [10·6 to 14·1]). Efficacy against tuberculosis was 17·3% (95% CI −31·9 to 48·2) and against M tuberculosis infection was −3·8% (–28·1 to 15·9). Interpretation MVA85A was well tolerated and induced modest cell-mediated immune responses. Reasons for the absence of MVA85A efficacy against tuberculosis or M tuberculosis infection in infants need exploration. Funding Aeras, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford-Emergent Tuberculosis Consortium (OETC).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to Prevent HIV-1 Infection in Thailand
Rerks-Ngarm, S., Pitisuttithum, P., Nitayaphan, S., Kaewkungwal, J., Chiu, J., Paris, R., Premsri, N., Namwat, C., de Souza, M., Adams, E., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908492 · Cited by 3,034
Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity
Fine, P. E. M. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92348-9 · Cited by 1,380
Trunz, B. B., Fine, P., & Dye, C. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68507-3 · Cited by 1,114
Colditz, G. A., Berkey, C. S., Mosteller, F., Brewer, T. F., Wilson, M. E., Burdick, E., & Fineberg, H. V. (1995) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.96.1.29 · Cited by 763
A Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Infants
The RTS, S. C. T. P. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1208394 · Cited by 752
Protective Effect of BCG against Tuberculous Meningitis and Miliary Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis
RODRIGUES, L. C., DIWAN, V. K., & WHEELER, J. G. (1993) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/22.6.1154 · Cited by 650
McShane, H., Pathan, A. A., Sander, C. R., Keating, S. M., Gilbert, S. C., Huygen, K., Fletcher, H. A., & Hill, A. V. S. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1128 · Cited by 570
Self-citationA multistage tuberculosis vaccine that confers efficient protection before and after exposure
Aagaard, C., Hoang, T., Dietrich, J., Cardona, P.-J., Izzo, A., Dolganov, G., Schoolnik, G. K., Cassidy, J. P., Billeskov, R., & Andersen, P. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2285 · Cited by 527
Kagina, B. M. N., Abel, B., Scriba, T. J., Hughes, E. J., Keyser, A., Soares, A., Gamieldien, H., Sidibana, M., Hatherill, M., Gelderbloem, S., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201003-0334oc · Cited by 402
Self-citationGoonetilleke, N. P., McShane, H., Hannan, C. M., Anderson, R. J., Brookes, R. H., & Hill, A. V. S. (2003) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1602 · Cited by 360
Self-citation
Cited by
A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments
Pollard, A. J., & Bijker, E. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00479-7 · Cited by 1,593
Pai, M., Behr, M. A., Dowdy, D., Dheda, K., Divangahi, M., Boehme, C. C., Ginsberg, A., Swaminathan, S., Spigelman, M., Getahun, H., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.76 · Cited by 1,270
BCG Educates Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Generate Protective Innate Immunity against Tuberculosis
Kaufmann, E., Sanz, J., Dunn, J. L., Khan, N., Mendonça, L. E., Pacis, A., Tzelepis, F., Pernet, E., Dumaine, A., Grenier, J.-C., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.031 · Cited by 1,191
Protection by BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Mangtani, P., Abubakar, I., Ariti, C., Beynon, R., Pimpin, L., Fine, P. E. M., Rodrigues, L. C., Smith, P. G., Lipman, M., Whiting, P. F., et al. (2014) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit790 · Cited by 995
Proof of principle for epitope-focused vaccine design
Correia, B. E., Bates, J. T., Loomis, R. J., Baneyx, G., Carrico, C., Jardine, J. G., Rupert, P., Correnti, C., Kalyuzhniy, O., Vittal, V., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12966 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Tameris, M. D., Hatherill, M., Landry, B. S., Scriba, T. J., Snowden, M. A., Lockhart, S., Shea, J. E., McClain, J. B., Hussey, G. D., Hanekom, W. A., Mahomed, H., & McShane, H.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 9871
- Pages
- 1021-1028
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2137633461
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 96.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60177-4
- The paper
- Tameris, M. D., Hatherill, M., Landry, B. S., Scriba, T. J., Snowden, M. A., Lockhart, S., Shea, J. E., McClain, J. B., Hussey, G. D., Hanekom, W. A., Mahomed, H., & McShane, H. (2013). Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60177-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.